Literature DB >> 14739816

Dose-dependent effects of propofol on the central processing of thermal pain.

Robert K Hofbauer1, Pierre Fiset, Gilles Plourde, Steven B Backman, M Catherine Bushnell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anatomic and physiologic data show that multiple regions of the forebrain are activated by pain. However, the effect of anesthetic level on nociceptive input to these regions is not well understood.
METHODS: The authors used positron emission tomography to measure the effect of various concentrations of propofol on pain-evoked changes in regional cerebral blood flow. Fifteen volunteers were scanned while warm and painful heat stimuli were presented to the volar forearm using a contact thermode during administration of target propofol concentrations of 0.0 microg/ml (alert control), 0.5 microg/ml (mild sedation), 1.5 microg/ml (moderate sedation), and 3.5 microg/ml (unconsciousness).
RESULTS: During the 0.5-microg/ml target propofol concentration (mild sedation), the subjects' pain ratings increased relative to the alert control condition; correspondingly, pain-evoked regional cerebral blood flow increased in the thalamus and the anterior cingulate cortex. In contrast, when subjects lost consciousness (3.5 microg/ml), pain-evoked responses in the thalamus and the anterior cingulate cortex were no longer observed, whereas significant pain-evoked activation remained in the insular cortex.
CONCLUSION: These data show that propofol has a dose-dependent effect on thalamocortical transfer of nociceptive information but that some pain-evoked cortical activity remains after loss of consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739816     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200402000-00031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  20 in total

1.  Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Marie-Claire Albanese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  2020 Foresight: Envisioning Therapeutic Innovations for Pain.

Authors:  May Hamza; Raymond A Dionne
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg       Date:  2009

3.  Capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia and sensitization in the human trigeminal nociceptive pathway: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Eric A Moulton; Gautam Pendse; Susie Morris; Andrew Strassman; Matthew Aiello-Lammens; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The cerebellum and pain: passive integrator or active participator?

Authors:  Eric A Moulton; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Lino Becerra; David Borsook
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2010-05-27

Review 5.  Can neuroimaging studies identify pain endophenotypes in humans?

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  A hypothetical universal model of cerebellar function: reconsideration of the current dogma.

Authors:  Ari Magal
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Metabolic brain activity suggestive of persistent pain in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Scott J Thompson; Magali Millecamps; Antonio Aliaga; David A Seminowicz; Lucie A Low; Barry J Bedell; Laura S Stone; Petra Schweinhardt; M Catherine Bushnell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Effect of sedation on pain perception.

Authors:  Michael A Frölich; Kui Zhang; Timothy J Ness
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Pharmacologic Modulation of Noxious Stimulus-evoked Brain Activation in Cynomolgus Macaques Observed with Functional Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Tomomi Shirai; Mizuho Yano; Takahiro Natsume; YūJi Awaga; Yoshitaka Itani; Aldric Hama; Akihisa Matsuda; Hiroyuki Takamatsu
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 10.  Unrecognized suffering in the ICU: addressing dyspnea in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Robert B Banzett; Mathieu Raux; Capucine Morélot-Panzini; Laurence Dangers; Thomas Similowski; Alexandre Demoule
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.