Literature DB >> 14739380

Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: a questionnaire as a means of problem diagnosis.

M Lahtinen1, C Sundman-Digert, K Reijula.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the relation between the psychosocial work environment and the perceived indoor air problems measured by a questionnaire survey; and to discuss the role of a questionnaire as a means to enhance collaboration in the challenging multiprofessional process of solving indoor air problems.
METHODS: The research material comprises surveys conducted in 1996-99 in 122 office workplaces with 11 154 employees.
RESULTS: The association between the psychosocial work environment measured by the Indoor Air Questionnaire (MM-40) and the occupants' complaints concerning indoor air as well as symptoms attributed to indoor air was significant. Those who perceived their psychosocial work environment more negatively had more complaints regarding the indoor environment and more symptoms attributed to the indoor air. The association was detected among both genders, in every age group, among smokers and non-smokers, and respondents with an allergic or a non-allergic background.
CONCLUSIONS: Results support the hypothesis that psychosocial factors in the work environment play a significant role in indoor air problems at workplaces. The survey data can be used as a reference database for future studies, and in occupational health care practice when the working conditions of individual workplaces are estimated. The MM-40 could be useful as a practical screening method in field work for analysing the role of the psychosocial work environment among the different background factors of an indoor air problem. However, in order to interpret and evaluate the significance of the results concerning a single workplace, more information on the organisation is needed, as well as cooperation and discussions with the staff. Further studies of the reliability and validity of the psychosocial questions in MM-40 are also needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739380      PMCID: PMC1740705          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2002.005835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

1.  Psychosocial dimensions of solving an indoor air problem.

Authors:  Marjaana Lahtinen; Pekka Huuhtanen; Erkki Kähkönen; Kari Reijula
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 2.  Sick building syndrome, work factors and occupational stress.

Authors:  J O Crawford; S M Bolas
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Sick building syndrome: a study of 4373 office workers.

Authors:  S Burge; A Hedge; S Wilson; J H Bass; A Robertson
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1987

4.  Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men?

Authors:  B Stenberg; S Wall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Assessment of indoor air problems at work with a questionnaire.

Authors:  K Reijula; C Sundman-Digert
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  The influence of individual and contextual psychosocial work factors on the perception of the indoor environment at work: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Brauer; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Asthma related to workplace dampness and impaired work ability.

Authors:  Kirsi Karvala; Henrik Nordman; Ritva Luukkonen; Jukka Uitti
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Work-related symptoms in indoor environments: a puzzling problem for the occupational physician.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Remediating buildings damaged by dampness and mould for preventing or reducing respiratory tract symptoms, infections and asthma.

Authors:  Riitta Sauni; Jos H Verbeek; Jukka Uitti; Merja Jauhiainen; Kathleen Kreiss; Torben Sigsgaard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-25

5.  Building health: an epidemiological study of "sick building syndrome" in the Whitehall II study.

Authors:  A F Marmot; J Eley; M Stafford; S A Stansfeld; E Warwick; M G Marmot
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Test-retest repeatability of child's respiratory symptoms and perceived indoor air quality - comparing self- and parent-administered questionnaires.

Authors:  Jussi Lampi; Sari Ung-Lanki; Päivi Santalahti; Juha Pekkanen
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  School environment as predictor of teacher sick leave: data-linked prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jenni Ervasti; Mika Kivimäki; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Jaana Pentti; Tuula Oksanen; Riikka Puusniekka; Tiina Pohjonen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Gender, airborne chemical monitoring, and physical work environment are related to indoor air symptoms among nonindustrial workers in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Authors:  Aizat Ismail Syazwan; Juahir Hafizan; Mohd Rafee Baharudin; Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman; Zulkapri Izwyn; Ismail Zulfadhli; Katis Syahidatussyakirah
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Ventilation Positive Pressure Intervention Effect on Indoor Air Quality in a School Building with Moisture Problems.

Authors:  Camilla Vornanen-Winqvist; Kati Järvi; Sander Toomla; Kaiser Ahmed; Maria A Andersson; Raimo Mikkola; Tamás Marik; László Kredics; Heidi Salonen; Jarek Kurnitski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Association between Four-Level Categorisation of Indoor Exposure and Perceived Indoor Air Quality.

Authors:  Katja Tähtinen; Sanna Lappalainen; Kirsi Karvala; Jouko Remes; Heidi Salonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.