Literature DB >> 14739364

Test-retest reliability of swept visual evoked potential measurements of infant visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Lotte Lauritzen1, Marianne Hørby Jørgensen, Kim Fleischer Michaelsen.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to describe variations in swept visual evoked potential (SWEEP-VEP) assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in infants and to evaluate the best way to estimate visual performance from obtained SWEEP-VEP data. The visual performance of 92 infants (6-40 wk of age) was measured in two separate visits. Results were verified with repeated tests in seven adults. There was a strong association between the two measurements of infant visual acuity (r = 0.91, p < 0.001), with no constant bias and an inter-assay coefficient of variation of 8.4%. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 17% and in repeated sessions all obtained acuity measures were normally distributed, indicating that the mean and not the maximum threshold best estimates visual acuity. This estimate of visual acuity also had lower test-retest variability than those calculated from the maximum threshold or threshold from the average EEG signals (p = 0.001). Test-retest measures of infant contrast sensitivity had a correlation coefficient of 0.72 (p < 0.001) and an inter-assay coefficient of variation of 23%. With the observed test-retest variability, SWEEP-VEP is less valid for estimating the visual performance of individual subjects, but it can give reliable group means. This method was well suited to describe visual development in the infants, which for acuity as well as contrast sensitivity increased by 0.64 octave per doubling in age. However, the variability of the SWEEP-VEP method can be a limiting factor, for example, in the assessment of the potential effect of dietary docosahexaenoic acid in a homogeneous group of infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14739364     DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000113769.44799.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  13 in total

1.  Reliability of acuities determined with the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP).

Authors:  William H Ridder; Anna Tong; Theresa Floresca
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Objective measurement of human visual acuity by visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A K Kharauzov; S V Pronin; A F Sobolev; S A Koskin; E V Boiko; Yu E Shelepin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-11

3.  The exact estimation of visual acuity by VEP technology: a report of 726 cases of eye injury.

Authors:  Guangxun Rao; Bingwei Wu; Lingli Zhang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-14

4.  Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults.

Authors:  Fahad M Almoqbel; Naveen K Yadav; Susan J Leat; Liseann M Head; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Early visual-evoked potential acuity and future behavioral acuity in cortical visual impairment.

Authors:  Tonya Watson; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Celso Tello; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Peter Derr; Jayson Patel; John Siegfried; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Maternal fish oil supplementation in lactation: effect on visual acuity and n-3 fatty acid content of infant erythrocytes.

Authors:  Lotte Lauritzen; Marianne H Jørgensen; Tina B Mikkelsen; lb M Skovgaard; Ellen-Marie Straarup; Sjúrdur F Olsen; Carl-Erik Høy; Kim F Michaelsen
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  Contrast sensitivity is reduced in children with infantile spasms.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mirabella; Sharon Morong; J Raymond Buncic; O Carter Snead; William J Logan; Shelly K Weiss; Mohamed Abdolell; Carol A Westall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hamilton; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich; Michael B Hoffmann; J Vernon Odom; Daphne L McCulloch; Dorothy A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Development of contrast mechanisms in humans: a VEP study.

Authors:  Leticia A García-Quispe; James Gordon; Vance Zemon
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.