OBJECTIVE: The ability of the potent cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor torcetrapib (CP-529,414) to raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in healthy young subjects was tested in this initial phase 1 multidose study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five groups of 8 subjects each were randomized to placebo (n=2) or torcetrapib (n=6) at 10, 30, 60, and 120 mg daily and 120 mg twice daily for 14 days. Torcetrapib was well tolerated, with all treated subjects completing the study. The correlation of plasma drug levels with inhibition (EC50=43 nM) was as expected based on in vitro potency (IC50 approximately 50 nM), and increases in CETP mass were consistent with the proposed mechanism of inhibition. CETP inhibition increased with escalating dose, leading to elevations of HDL-C of 16% to 91%. Total plasma cholesterol did not change significantly because of a reduction in nonHDL-C, including a 21% to 42% lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at the higher doses. Apolipoprotein A-I and E were elevated 27% and 66%, respectively, and apoB was reduced 26% with 120 mg twice daily. Cholesteryl ester content decreased and triglyceride increased in the nonHDL plasma fraction, with contrasting changes occurring in HDL. CONCLUSIONS: These effects of CETP inhibition resemble those observed in partial CETP deficiency. This work serves as a prelude to further studies in subjects with low HDL, or combinations of dyslipidemia, in assessing the role of CETP in atherosclerosis.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The ability of the potent cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor torcetrapib (CP-529,414) to raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in healthy young subjects was tested in this initial phase 1 multidose study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five groups of 8 subjects each were randomized to placebo (n=2) or torcetrapib (n=6) at 10, 30, 60, and 120 mg daily and 120 mg twice daily for 14 days. Torcetrapib was well tolerated, with all treated subjects completing the study. The correlation of plasma drug levels with inhibition (EC50=43 nM) was as expected based on in vitro potency (IC50 approximately 50 nM), and increases in CETP mass were consistent with the proposed mechanism of inhibition. CETP inhibition increased with escalating dose, leading to elevations of HDL-C of 16% to 91%. Total plasma cholesterol did not change significantly because of a reduction in nonHDL-C, including a 21% to 42% lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at the higher doses. Apolipoprotein A-I and E were elevated 27% and 66%, respectively, and apoB was reduced 26% with 120 mg twice daily. Cholesteryl ester content decreased and triglyceride increased in the nonHDL plasma fraction, with contrasting changes occurring in HDL. CONCLUSIONS: These effects of CETP inhibition resemble those observed in partial CETP deficiency. This work serves as a prelude to further studies in subjects with low HDL, or combinations of dyslipidemia, in assessing the role of CETP in atherosclerosis.
Authors: Mollie Ranalletta; Kathleen K Bierilo; Ying Chen; Denise Milot; Qing Chen; Elaine Tung; Caroline Houde; Nadine H Elowe; Margarita Garcia-Calvo; Gene Porter; Suzanne Eveland; Betsy Frantz-Wattley; Mike Kavana; George Addona; Peter Sinclair; Carl Sparrow; Edward A O'Neill; Ken S Koblan; Ayesha Sitlani; Brian Hubbard; Timothy S Fisher Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2010-05-10 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Guoqing Cao; Thomas P Beyer; Youyan Zhang; Robert J Schmidt; Yan Q Chen; Sandra L Cockerham; Karen M Zimmerman; Sotirios K Karathanasis; Ellen A Cannady; Todd Fields; Nathan B Mantlo Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Roberto Martínez-Beamonte; María A Navarro; Sergio Acin; Natalia Guillén; Cristina Barranquero; Carmen Arnal; Joaquín Surra; Jesus Osada Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas Gautier; David Masson; Miek C Jong; Jean-Paul Pais de Barros; Linda Duverneuil; Naig Le Guern; Valérie Deckert; Laure Dumont; Amandine Bataille; Zoulika Zak; Xian-Cheng Jiang; Louis M Havekes; Laurent Lagrost Journal: Biochem J Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 3.857