Literature DB >> 14738199

Mercury hazards from gold mining to humans, plants, and animals.

Ronald Eisler1.   

Abstract

Mercury contamination of the environment from historical and ongoing mining practices that rely on mercury amalgamation for gold extraction is widespread. Contamination was particularly severe in the immediate vicinity of gold extraction and refining operations; however, mercury, especially in the form of water-soluble methylmercury, may be transported to pristine areas by rainwater, water currents, deforestation, volatilization, and other vectors. Examples of gold mining-associated mercury pollution have been shown for Canada, the U.S., Africa, China, the Philippines, Siberia, and South America. In parts of Brazil, for example, mercury concentrations in all abiotic materials, plants, and animals, including endangered species of mammals and reptiles, collected near ongoing mercury amalgamation gold mining sites were far in excess of allowable mercury levels promulgated by regulatory agencies for the protection of human health and natural resources. Although health authorities in Brazil are unable to detect conclusive evidence of human mercury intoxication, the potential exists in the absence of mitigation for epidemic mercury poisoning of the mining population and environs. In the U.S., environmental mercury contamination is mostly from historical gold mining practices, and portions of Nevada remain sufficiently mercury contaminated to pose a hazard to reproduction of carnivorous fishes and fish-eating birds. Concentrations of total mercury lethal to sensitive representative natural resources range from 0.1 to 2.0 microg/L of medium for aquatic organisms; from 2,200 to 31,000 microg/kg BW (acute oral) and from 4,000 to 40,000 microg/kg (dietary) for birds; and from 100 to 500 microg/kg BW (daily dose) and from 1,000 to 5,000 microg/kg diet for mammals. Significant adverse sublethal effects were observed among selected aquatic species at water concentrations of 0.03-0.1 microg Hg/L. For some birds, adverse effects, mainly on reproduction, have been associated with total mercury concentrations (microg/kg FW) of 5,000 in feathers, 900 in eggs, and 50-100 in diet, and with daily intakes of 640 microg/kg BW. Sensitive nonhuman mammals showed significant adverse effects of mercury when daily intakes were 250 microg/kg BW, when dietary levels were 1,100 microg/kg, or when tissue concentrations exceeded 1,100 microg/kg. Proposed mercury criteria for protection of aquatic life range from 0.012 microg/L for freshwater life to 0.025 microg/L for marine life; for birds, less than 100 microg/kg diet FW; and for small mammals, less than 1,100 microg/kg FW diet. All these proposed criteria provide, at best, minimal protection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14738199     DOI: 10.1007/0-387-21733-9_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  13 in total

1.  Recent Advances in Mercury Research.

Authors:  Ebany J Martinez-Finley; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2014-03-28

Review 2.  Mercury exposure and children's health.

Authors:  Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Kathleen M McCarty; Nadine Steckling; Beate Lettmeier
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2010-09

3.  Role of environment and sex differences in the development of autoimmune diseases: a roundtable meeting report.

Authors:  Monica P Mallampalli; Erika Davies; Debra Wood; Hillary Robertson; Federica Polato; Christine L Carter
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Changes in metabolic enzymes, cortisol and glucose concentrations of Beluga (Huso huso) exposed to dietary methylmercury.

Authors:  Ahmad Gharaei; Mostafa Ghaffari; Saeed Keyvanshokooh; Reza Akrami
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.794

5.  Blue whale earplug reveals lifetime contaminant exposure and hormone profiles.

Authors:  Stephen J Trumble; Eleanor M Robinson; Michelle Berman-Kowalewski; Charles W Potter; Sascha Usenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Cyanidation of Mercury-Contaminated Tailings: Potential Health Effects and Environmental Justice.

Authors:  Kevin Drace; Adam M Kiefer; Marcello M Veiga
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-12

7.  Beluga (Huso huso, Brandet 1869) bioenergetics under dietary methylmercury.

Authors:  A Gharaei; A Esmaili-Sari; V Jafari-Shamoshaki; M Ghaffari
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.794

8.  Molecular cloning of cDNA of mammalian and chicken II gonadotropin-releasing hormones (mGnRHs and cGnRH-II) in the beluga (Huso huso) and the disruptive effect of methylmercury on gene expression.

Authors:  Ahmad Gharaei; Fereidoun Mahboudi; Abbas Esmaili-Sari; Rozita Edalat; Ahmad Adeli; Saeed Keyvanshokooh
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 2.794

9.  Parallel changes of taxonomic interaction networks in lacustrine bacterial communities induced by a polymetallic perturbation.

Authors:  Karine Laplante; Boutin Sébastien; Nicolas Derome
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Environmental contaminants in freshwater fish and their risk to piscivorous wildlife based on a national monitoring program.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Hinck; Christopher J Schmitt; Kimberly A Chojnacki; Donald E Tillitt
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.