Literature DB >> 14737918

Antepartum bed rest: maternal weight change and infant birth weight.

Judith A Maloni1, Greg R Alexander, Mark D Schluchter, Dinesh M Shah, Seunghee Park.   

Abstract

Despite lack of evidence for effectiveness, obstetricians in the United States prescribe antepartum bed rest for more than 700,000 women per year. However, in nonpregnant samples, bed rest treatment produces weight loss. This study assessed maternal weight change (gain) during antepartum hospitalization for bed rest treatment; compared appropriateness of infant birth weights for gestational age, race, and gender; and determined whether maternal weight change predicted infant birth weight. The convenience sample for this longitudinal study consisted of 141 women with high-risk pregnancies who were treated with hospital bed rest. Weekly rate of pregnancy weight change by body mass index was compared with Institute of Medicine recommendations for rate of pregnancy weight gain. Infant birth weight was compared with current US infant birth weights for matching gestational age, gender, and race. Weekly antepartum weight change was significantly lower than Institute of Medicine recommendations (P < 0.001). Infant birth weights were also significantly lower than the national mean when matched for each infant's gestational age, race, and gender (P < 0.001). Maternal weight change predicted infant birth weight (P = 0.05). Bed rest treatment is ineffective for improving pregnancy weight gain. Lower infant birth weights across all gestational ages suggest that maternal weight loss during bed rest may be associated with an increased risk of fetal growth restriction. A randomized trial comparing women with high-risk pregnancies who are ambulatory with those on bed rest is needed to determine whether bed rest treatment, underlying maternal-fetal disease, or both influence inadequate maternal weight gain and poor intrauterine growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14737918     DOI: 10.1177/1099800403260307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Res Nurs        ISSN: 1099-8004            Impact factor:   2.522


  8 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest.

Authors:  Judith A Maloni
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  A foetal energy balance equation based on maternal exercise and diet.

Authors:  Diana M Thomas; James F Clapp; Susan Shernce
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Childbirth education for multiple pregnancy: part 1: prenatal considerations.

Authors:  Kristen S Montgomery; Sabrina Cubera; Christie Belcher; David Patrick; Heather Funderburk; Christa Melton; Michelle Fastenau
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2005

4.  Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #50: The role of activity restriction in obstetric management: (Replaces Consult Number 33, August 2014).

Authors:  Jhenette Lauder; Anthony Sciscione; Joseph Biggio; Sarah Osmundson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Guidelines for Physical Activity during Pregnancy: Comparisons From Around the World.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Ruben Barakat; Wendy J Brown; Patricia Dargent-Molina; Megumi Haruna; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Michelle F Mottola; Katrine M Owe; Emily K Rousham; SeonAe Yeo
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-03

6.  Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study.

Authors:  Diana R Di Fabio; Courtney K Blomme; Katie M Smith; Gregory J Welk; Christina G Campbell
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Provider advice on physical activity and nutrition in twin pregnancies: a cross-sectional electronic survey.

Authors:  Kara M Whitaker; Meghan Baruth; Rebecca A Schlaff; Hailee Talbot; Christopher P Connolly; Jihong Liu; Sara Wilcox
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Weight loss before conception: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsum; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Anna-Sigrid Olafsdottir; Sjurdur F Olsen; Inga Thorsdottir
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.