Literature DB >> 14736839

Why nearly all PET of abdominal and pelvic cancers will be performed as PET/CT.

Richard L Wahl1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Clinical experience at Johns Hopkins and published literature regarding PET/CT applications in the abdomen and pelvis are reviewed, and the strengths and limitations of this evolving technology are summarized. More than 2,700 whole-body PET/CT scans including the abdomen and pelvis were performed for clinical indications by our nuclear medicine service from June 2001 through September 2003. Indications for these studies are reviewed, and our clinical impressions of diagnostic advantages and limitations of PET/CT are reported. Of the >2,700 whole-body PET/CT scans performed at our institution, >90% were for known or suspected cancers. Primary abdominopelvic indications were second in frequency to thoracic indications. In addition, a comprehensive literature search was performed, and key articles related to PET/CT in the abdomen and pelvis were identified, reviewed, and summarized. Under the search term "PET/CT," 142 articles were identified under the National Library of Medicine Pub Med database, and a number of general findings are summarized.
CONCLUSION: PET/CT allows for the accurate localization of foci of radiotracer uptake and their separation from normal structures. In our experience, the method is quantitatively accurate, rapid, and easily implemented, including contrast studies, in clinical practice in a wide range of abdominopelvic indications. Although artifacts can occur from a variety of causes, close attention to protocol details and patient immobilization reduces their frequency. Where systematically studied, PET/CT improves diagnostic accuracy compared with PET alone. It is anticipated that PET/CT will increasingly become the routine and preferred procedure for abdominopelvic evaluations with PET imaging. It has already become the preferred method at our center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Oral contrast medium in PET/CT: should you or shouldn't you?

Authors:  Ashley M Groves; Irfan Kayani; John C Dickson; Caroline Townsend; Ian Croasdale; Rizwan Syed; Nagesh Nagabushan; Sharon F Hain; Peter J Ell; Jamshed B Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Update of PET and PET/CT for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; William H Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Characterization of an Orthotopic Colorectal Cancer Mouse Model and Its Feasibility for Accurate Quantification in Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Sara Rapic; Christel Vangestel; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Tim Van den Wyngaert; Rukun Hinz; Marleen Verhoye; Patrick Pauwels; Steven Staelens; Sigrid Stroobants
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  False-positive FDG PET uptake--the role of PET/CT.

Authors:  Sandra J Rosenbaum; Thomas Lind; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lujaien A Kadhim; Avani S Dholakia; Joseph M Herman; Richard L Wahl; Muhammad A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-30

6.  The incremental value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric malignancies.

Authors:  Zvi Bar-Sever; Zohar Keidar; Ayelet Ben-Barak; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Sergey Postovsky; Luda Guralnik; Myriam W Ben Arush; Ora Israel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  The additional value of PET/CT over PET in FDG imaging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rachel Bar-Shalom; Ludmila Guralnik; Medy Tsalic; Max Leiderman; Alex Frenkel; Diana Gaitini; Alon Ben-Nun; Zohar Keidar; Ora Israel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Prostate cancer: a comparative study of 11C-choline PET and MR imaging combined with proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Takako Yamaguchi; Jin Lee; Hiroji Uemura; Takeshi Sasaki; Nobukazu Takahashi; Takashi Oka; Kazuya Shizukuishi; Hisashi Endou; Yoshinobu Kubota; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  PET/CT Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor Change Measurement, Truth Data, and Error.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Robert K Doot; Michelle Wanner-Roybal; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Geoffrey McLennan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies: CT vs PET.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Mi Jin Yun; Mi-Suk Park; Seung Hwan Cha; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jong Doo Lee; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.