Literature DB >> 14736466

Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery.

John A Casaletto1, Raymond Gatt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In this retrospective study, we looked at the difference in 1 year mortality between two groups of patients who were operated for fracture of the hip. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In cohort 1, 72% of the patients underwent surgery on the same day of admission, 15% of the patients were operated on the next day, the remaining 13% of the patients waited more than 1 day for surgery. The mean waiting time was 0.47 day. The percentage of patients who were operated on the same day of admission in cohort 2 was 18%. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had to wait 1 day before they were operated and 13% waited 2 days or more. The average waiting time was 1.01 days. The date of death for both the 166 patients in cohort 1 and the 197 patients in cohort 2, was obtained from the national mortality register and the 1 year mortality was calculated. These two groups of patients were from separate 12 month periods and the operations performed were either Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or hemiarthroplasty. The two groups were comparable in gender, age distribution and the types of operations.
RESULTS: There was an increase of 10.1% (P<0.025, chi(2), 1 d.f.; 95% CI 1.7-18.5) in the mortality of patients in cohort 2. The mortality data of the two cohorts was also analysed after dividing the patients into three groups according to their age. A statistically significant increase in mortality of 16.9% in patients over 80 years of age in cohort 2 was found. The difference in mortality was still statistically significant when only patients over 80 years of age and having a DHS operation were compared. Total mortality at 2 years after the operation was the same in the two cohorts. Mortality rate for patients in cohort 2 was less than that for cohort 1 patients during the second post-operative year.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that survival at 1 year is better when patients who are medically fit for surgery are operated on the same day of admission. This survival advantage is more pronounced for patients who are over 80 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736466     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(03)00210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  30 in total

1.  Quality effects of operative delay on mortality in hip fracture treatment.

Authors:  R Sund; A Liski
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

2.  [Hip surgery immediately following stent revascularization of an acute myocardial infarction].

Authors:  A M Mathes; I Riemer; A Link; H Rensing
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  A multicenter survey on profile of care for hip fracture: predictors of mortality and disability.

Authors:  S Maggi; P Siviero; T Wetle; R W Besdine; M Saugo; G Crepaldi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay in 2,756 elderly patients with hip fractures: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical management.

Authors:  Stephen Thong Soon Tan; Wei Ping Marcus Tan; Josephine Jaipaul; Siew Pang Chan; Sathappan S Sathappan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Effect of surgical delay on outcome in hip fracture patients: a retrospective multivariate analysis of 192 patients.

Authors:  D O F Verbeek; K J Ponsen; J C Goslings; M J Heetveld
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MRI protocol for detecting radiographically occult hip and pelvis fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Andrew B Ross; Brian Y Chan; Paul H Yi; Michael D Repplinger; David J Vanness; Kenneth S Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Does timing of surgery matter in fragility hip fractures?

Authors:  F Leung; T W Lau; K Kwan; S P Chow; A W C Kung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  [Guideline compliance in hip fracture: results of an external quality-assurance program in North Rhine Westphalia: 2003-2005].

Authors:  U Schulze Raestrup; A Grams; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Hip fracture in the elderly: does counting time from fracture to surgery or from hospital admission to surgery matter when studying in-hospital mortality?

Authors:  E I O Vidal; D C Moreira-Filho; C M Coeli; K R Camargo; F B Fukushima; R Blais
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The role of composite technique in managing peri implant re-fractures in a case with supracondylar fracture of the femur: a case report.

Authors:  Altaf Ahmad Kawoosa; Shabir Ahmad Dhar; Mohammed Farooq Butt; Ghulam Nabi Dar; Mohammed Ramzan Mir
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.