| Literature DB >> 14736156 |
Abstract
The performance of 10 commonly used genotyping tools in the detection and differentiation of 7 human-pathogenic Cryptosporidium spp. (C. hominis, C. parvum, C. meleagridis, C. felis, C. canis, C. muris and Cryptosporidium pig genotype 1) was evaluated. All 3 SU rRNA gene-based tools could amplify the DNA of 7 Cryptosporidium spp. efficiently. However, the tools based on the antigens TRAP-C1, TRAP-C2 and COWP genes, the housekeeping genes HSP70 and DHFR, or a genomic sequence, failed to detect the DNA of C. felis, C. canis, Cryptosporidium pig genotype I, and C. muris. With the exception of 1 tool based on the TRAP-C2 gene, the PCR-RFLP or the PCR sequencing tools evaluated in this study could differentiate C. hominis, C. parvum and C. meleagridis from each other, and 2 SSU rRNA gene-based tools could differentiate all 7 Cryptosporidium spp. Thus, a thorough understanding of the strength and weakness of each technique is needed when using molecular diagnostic tool in epidemiological investigations of human cryptosporidiosis.Entities:
Mesh：
Substances：
Year: 2003 PMID： 14736156 DOI： 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2003.tb00623.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Eukaryot Microbiol ISSN： 1066-5234 Impact factor: 3.346