OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of physicians with varying degrees of experience to predict the length of stay and outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Prospective, interview-based study. SETTING: A 31-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: A total of 223 consecutive patients (excluding those admitted for routine post-operative surveillance) admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians immediately responsible for each patient, and others fully aware of the case, were interviewed separately during the first 12 h of ICU admission to determine their assessment of the patient's likely duration of stay on the ICU and the probable outcome. Degree of predictive accuracy was assessed using the Kappa statistic with kappa < or =0.2 poor, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.8 good, and 0.81-1.0 very good. Physicians were graded according to their degree of experience as junior (less than 1 year ICU experience), medium (critical care fellow), and senior (staff physician with supervising functions). For lengths of stay less than 5 days, senior physicians were better predictors than less experienced doctors. For outcome prediction, physicians were generally moderately good at predicting death, with senior physicians tending to be more accurate than their less experienced colleagues (senior kappa 0.68, medium kappa 0.52, junior kappa 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of length of ICU stay was poor amongst all physicians in patients with a length of stay greater than 5 days. Experienced physicians were better predictors of ICU lengths of stay less than 5 days and, in contrast to some reports, of ICU outcome than their more inexperienced counterparts.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of physicians with varying degrees of experience to predict the length of stay and outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Prospective, interview-based study. SETTING: A 31-bed mixed medical-surgical ICU. PATIENTS: A total of 223 consecutive patients (excluding those admitted for routine post-operative surveillance) admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians immediately responsible for each patient, and others fully aware of the case, were interviewed separately during the first 12 h of ICU admission to determine their assessment of the patient's likely duration of stay on the ICU and the probable outcome. Degree of predictive accuracy was assessed using the Kappa statistic with kappa < or =0.2 poor, 0.21-0.4 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.8 good, and 0.81-1.0 very good. Physicians were graded according to their degree of experience as junior (less than 1 year ICU experience), medium (critical care fellow), and senior (staff physician with supervising functions). For lengths of stay less than 5 days, senior physicians were better predictors than less experienced doctors. For outcome prediction, physicians were generally moderately good at predicting death, with senior physicians tending to be more accurate than their less experienced colleagues (senior kappa 0.68, medium kappa 0.52, junior kappa 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Prediction of length of ICU stay was poor amongst all physicians in patients with a length of stay greater than 5 days. Experienced physicians were better predictors of ICU lengths of stay less than 5 days and, in contrast to some reports, of ICU outcome than their more inexperienced counterparts.
Authors: H L Corwin; A Gettinger; R M Rodriguez; R G Pearl; K D Gubler; C Enny; T Colton; M J Corwin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: L S Murray; G M Teasdale; G D Murray; B Jennett; J D Miller; J D Pickard; M D Shaw; J Achilles; S Bailey; P Jones Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-06-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W A Knaus; F E Harrell; J Lynn; L Goldman; R S Phillips; A F Connors; N V Dawson; W J Fulkerson; R M Califf; N Desbiens; P Layde; R K Oye; P E Bellamy; R B Hakim; D P Wagner Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1995-02-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Nazima Allaudeen; Jeffrey L Schnipper; E John Orav; Robert M Wachter; Arpana R Vidyarthi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nathan R Hoot; Irene D Feurer; Mary T Austin; Michael K Porayko; J Kelly Wright; Nancy M Lorenzi; C Wright Pinson; Dominik Aronsky Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: F Willem Rozendaal; Peter E Spronk; Ferdinand F Snellen; Adri Schoen; Arthur R H van Zanten; Norbert A Foudraine; Paul G H Mulder; Jan Bakker Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 17.440