BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anterior approach for cervical radiculopathy is a frequently performed operation in neurosurgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term results of anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1999, we operated on 101 patients presenting with cervical radiculopathy by an anterior approach. The operation consisted of one-level discectomy in 74 cases, two-level discectomy in 25 cases and three-level discectomy in 2 cases. Eighty-four out of 130 levels operated on were fused. Evaluation was done following a consultation with dynamic cervical X-rays and by telephone using a detailed questionnaire. Follow-up was obtained in 91 cases with a mean of 54 months in fused patients, and a mean of 45 months in the non-fused patients. RESULTS: Post-operative results were good in 95% in the 2 groups of patients. We encountered 8 complications, all in patients operated with bone graft placement. Five patients were reoperated on at an adjacent level, 4 being fused previously. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 techniques are comparable in term of goods results at short and long-term follow-up. Anterior discectomy without fusion is associated with less complications, less post-operative pain, and less operative time cost.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anterior approach for cervical radiculopathy is a frequently performed operation in neurosurgery. The goal of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term results of anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1999, we operated on 101 patients presenting with cervical radiculopathy by an anterior approach. The operation consisted of one-level discectomy in 74 cases, two-level discectomy in 25 cases and three-level discectomy in 2 cases. Eighty-four out of 130 levels operated on were fused. Evaluation was done following a consultation with dynamic cervical X-rays and by telephone using a detailed questionnaire. Follow-up was obtained in 91 cases with a mean of 54 months in fused patients, and a mean of 45 months in the non-fused patients. RESULTS: Post-operative results were good in 95% in the 2 groups of patients. We encountered 8 complications, all in patients operated with bone graft placement. Five patients were reoperated on at an adjacent level, 4 being fused previously. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 techniques are comparable in term of goods results at short and long-term follow-up. Anterior discectomy without fusion is associated with less complications, less post-operative pain, and less operative time cost.