PURPOSE: KIT (CD117) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase representing a target for STI571 (Glivec) therapy. Some KIT-overexpressing solid tumors have responded favorably to STI571, potentially because of the presence of KIT-activating mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To investigate the epidemiology of KIT overexpression and mutations, we investigated a series of 1654 breast cancers. All tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. RESULTS: KIT expression was always present in normal breast epithelium. However, cancer analysis revealed the only 43 of 1654 (2.6%) tumors were KIT-positive. KIT expression was more frequent in medullary cancer (9 of 47 positive; 19.1%) than in any other histological tumor subtype (P < 0.001). KIT expression was significantly associated with high tumor grade (P < 0.0001) but unrelated to pT and pN categories or patient survival. Mutation analysis of exons 2, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 17 was negative in 10 KIT-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data show that a high level of KIT expression occurs infrequently in breast cancer. KIT-positive breast cancers may not reflect "KIT up-regulation" because KIT is also expressed in normal breast epithelium. The lack of KIT mutations also argues against the therapeutic efficacy of STI571 in breast cancer.
PURPOSE:KIT (CD117) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase representing a target for STI571 (Glivec) therapy. Some KIT-overexpressing solid tumors have responded favorably to STI571, potentially because of the presence of KIT-activating mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To investigate the epidemiology of KIT overexpression and mutations, we investigated a series of 1654 breast cancers. All tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. RESULTS:KIT expression was always present in normal breast epithelium. However, cancer analysis revealed the only 43 of 1654 (2.6%) tumors were KIT-positive. KIT expression was more frequent in medullary cancer (9 of 47 positive; 19.1%) than in any other histological tumor subtype (P < 0.001). KIT expression was significantly associated with high tumor grade (P < 0.0001) but unrelated to pT and pN categories or patient survival. Mutation analysis of exons 2, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 17 was negative in 10 KIT-positive tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data show that a high level of KIT expression occurs infrequently in breast cancer. KIT-positive breast cancers may not reflect "KIT up-regulation" because KIT is also expressed in normal breast epithelium. The lack of KIT mutations also argues against the therapeutic efficacy of STI571 in breast cancer.
Authors: Michael Medinger; Manuela Kleinschmidt; Klaus Mross; Barbara Wehmeyer; Clemens Unger; Hans-Eckart Schaefer; Renate Weber; Marc Azemar Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Helen K Chew; William E Barlow; Kathy Albain; Danika Lew; Allen Gown; Daniel F Hayes; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Robert Livingston Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Bassam Ghabach; William F Anderson; Rochelle E Curtis; Mark M Huycke; Jackie A Lavigne; Graça M Dores Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: C Charpin; S Giusiano; S Charfi; V Secq; S Carpentier; L Andrac; M-N Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; S Garcia Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 7.640