Literature DB >> 1473420

Prospective, randomized trial comparing pain and clinical function after conventional scissors excision/ligation vs. diathermy excision without ligation for symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids.

F Seow-Choen1, Y H Ho, H G Ang, H S Goh.   

Abstract

Forty-nine consecutive patients with symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids were prospectively randomized for conventional scissors excision with ligation (Group A; n = 16) or diathermy excision without ligation (Group B; n = 33). The median time taken to complete the procedure was 20 minutes (range, 10-40 minutes) and 10 minutes (range, 5-35 minutes) in Groups A and B, respectively (P < 0.05). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups, with a median of three days and a range of two to five days. The median length of follow-up was 35 weeks (range, 20-50 weeks) and 35 weeks (range, 20-51 weeks) for Groups A and B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the severity of postoperative pain between the two groups. The use of postoperative oral analgesics was significantly lower in Group B (P < 0.02), but there was no significant difference in the demand for intramuscular or topical analgesics. Diathermy excision of hemorrhoids is significantly faster than scissors excision, there is less bleeding, the vascular pedicles need not be ligated, and there is significant reduction in the requirement for oral analgesics postoperatively without any increase in early or late postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1473420     DOI: 10.1007/bf02251970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Minimal open hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  H D Roervik; A Heiner Campos; L Ilum; K F Herlak Styr; G K McKinstrey; B Brandstrup; G Olaison
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Hemorrhoidectomy - making sense of the surgical options.

Authors:  Danson Yeo; Kok-Yang Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage.

Authors:  Marc Singer; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

Review 5.  Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  V Shanmugam; M A Thaha; K S Rabindranath; K L Campbell; R J C Steele; M A Loudon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

7.  Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids.

Authors:  M Y Mastakov; P G Buettner; Y-H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Comparison of Effects of Vessel-Sealing Devices and Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Murat Kendirci; İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner; Yeliz Şahiner; Güven Güney
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-04-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.