BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve (CR) is the ability of an individual to cope with advancing brain pathological abnormalities so that he or she remains free of symptoms. Epidemiological data and evidence from positron emission tomography suggest that it may be mediated through education or IQ. OBJECTIVE: To investigate CR-mediated differential brain activation in Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects compared with healthy elderly persons. PARTICIPANTS: Using radioactive water positron emission tomography, we scanned 12 AD patients and 17 healthy elderly persons while performing a serial recognition memory task for nonverbalizable shapes under 2 conditions: low demand, in which one shape was presented in each study trial, and titrated demand, in which the study list length was adjusted so that each subject recognized shapes at approximately 75% accuracy. Positron emission tomographic scan acquisition included the encoding and recognition phases. A CR factor score that summarized years of education, National Adult Reading Test estimated IQ, and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised vocabulary subtest score (explaining 71% of the total variance) was used as an index of CR. Voxel-wise, multiple regression analyses were performed with the "activation" difference (titrated demand-low demand) as the dependent variables and the CR factor score as the independent one. Brain regions where regression slopes differed between the 2 groups were identified. RESULTS: The slopes were significantly more positive for the AD patients in the left precentral gyrus and in the left hippocampus and significantly more negative in the right fusiform, right middle occipital, left superior occipital, and left middle temporal gyri. CONCLUSION: Brain regions where systematic relationships (slopes) between subjects' education-IQ and brain activation differ as a function of disease status may mediate the differential ability to cope with (ie, delay or modify) clinical manifestations of AD.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve (CR) is the ability of an individual to cope with advancing brain pathological abnormalities so that he or she remains free of symptoms. Epidemiological data and evidence from positron emission tomography suggest that it may be mediated through education or IQ. OBJECTIVE: To investigate CR-mediated differential brain activation in Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects compared with healthy elderly persons. PARTICIPANTS: Using radioactive water positron emission tomography, we scanned 12 ADpatients and 17 healthy elderly persons while performing a serial recognition memory task for nonverbalizable shapes under 2 conditions: low demand, in which one shape was presented in each study trial, and titrated demand, in which the study list length was adjusted so that each subject recognized shapes at approximately 75% accuracy. Positron emission tomographic scan acquisition included the encoding and recognition phases. A CR factor score that summarized years of education, National Adult Reading Test estimated IQ, and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised vocabulary subtest score (explaining 71% of the total variance) was used as an index of CR. Voxel-wise, multiple regression analyses were performed with the "activation" difference (titrated demand-low demand) as the dependent variables and the CR factor score as the independent one. Brain regions where regression slopes differed between the 2 groups were identified. RESULTS: The slopes were significantly more positive for the ADpatients in the left precentral gyrus and in the left hippocampus and significantly more negative in the right fusiform, right middle occipital, left superior occipital, and left middle temporal gyri. CONCLUSION: Brain regions where systematic relationships (slopes) between subjects' education-IQ and brain activation differ as a function of disease status may mediate the differential ability to cope with (ie, delay or modify) clinical manifestations of AD.
Authors: G E Alexander; M L Furey; C L Grady; P Pietrini; D R Brady; M J Mentis; M B Schapiro Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: L Mucke; E Masliah; G Q Yu; M Mallory; E M Rockenstein; G Tatsuno; K Hu; D Kholodenko; K Johnson-Wood; L McConlogue Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2000-06-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Carlos F Mendes De Leon; Lisa L Barnes; Julie A Schneider; Julia L Bienias; Denis A Evans; David A Bennett Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nikolaos Scarmeas; Eric Zarahn; Karen E Anderson; Christian G Habeck; John Hilton; Joseph Flynn; Karen S Marder; Karen L Bell; Harold A Sackeim; Ronald L Van Heertum; James R Moeller; Yaakov Stern Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-03
Authors: Richard N Jones; Jennifer Manly; M Maria Glymour; Dorene M Rentz; Angela L Jefferson; Yaakov Stern Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: B C Dickerson; D H Salat; D N Greve; E F Chua; E Rand-Giovannetti; D M Rentz; L Bertram; K Mullin; R E Tanzi; D Blacker; M S Albert; R A Sperling Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Laura L Boles Ponto; Vincent A Magnotta; David J Moser; Kevin M Duff; Susan K Schultz Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Annie Robitaille; Ardo van den Hout; Robson J M Machado; David A Bennett; Iva Čukić; Ian J Deary; Scott M Hofer; Emiel O Hoogendijk; Martijn Huisman; Boo Johansson; Andriy V Koval; Maaike van der Noordt; Andrea M Piccinin; Judith J M Rijnhart; Archana Singh-Manoux; Johan Skoog; Ingmar Skoog; John Starr; Lisa Vermunt; Sean Clouston; Graciela Muniz Terrera Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566