Literature DB >> 14731055

Neuropsychotherapeutics in the UK: what has been the impact of NICE on prescribing?

Tom Walley1.   

Abstract

The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) was set up in 1999 to advise the National Health Service (NHS) on the use of new technologies largely, but not exclusively, on the basis of their clinical and cost effectiveness. There have been problems with this, as with any developing system, most of which have arisen from issues not directly under the control of NICE. Despite this, NICE has already achieved a pivotal role in determining the uptake of new therapies into the NHS. In the area of neuropsychiatric therapies, NICE has examined a number of topics and has generally facilitated the increased use of the agents examined, approving the use, within limitations, of such drugs as riluzole, atypical antipsychotics and cholinesterase inhibitors. Although the use of some of these therapies had been growing, it had previously been restricted by funding in the NHS. As a result of NICE guidance, these funding restrictions have generally been lifted. NICE has rejected one area of neurological therapy so far--that of interferon-beta products and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis--on the grounds of clinical uncertainty about long-term benefits and poor cost effectiveness. However, the UK Government has created a novel risk-sharing scheme in collaboration with the sponsoring companies to make these drugs available at a level of cost effectiveness acceptable to the NHS. The feasibility of this scheme is as yet unclear. This might be seen as either a triumph for NICE or as an undermining of it for political ends. One interesting aspect that is more prominent in neuropsychiatric disorders than in other areas of NICE activity has been the power of patient advocacy in encouraging acceptance of therapies where the evidence base was weak or the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was unfavourable. The principles behind the activities of NICE attract wide support within the NHS, but the details of its decisions have often not been popular within NHS management who have to deliver them. Some of this relates more to the context and political environment within which NICE operates than to a failing within NICE itself. NICE will continue to become increasingly important in determining the use of new drugs within the UK NHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14731055     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200418010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  18 in total

1.  Equity in the new NHS: hard lessons from implementing a local healthcare policy on donepezil.

Authors:  Y Doyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

2.  Getting their say, or getting their way? Has participation strengthened the patient "voice" in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence?

Authors:  P Quennell
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  2001

3.  Riluzole for motor neurone disease. More trials are needed.

Authors:  J Sandercock; A Burls; C Hyde; A Fry-Smith; P Barton; S Bryan; A Stewart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

4.  Effectiveness, efficiency, and NICE.

Authors:  M Sculpher; M Drummond; B O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

5.  Problems with UK government's risk sharing scheme for assessing drugs for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Cathie L M Sudlow; Carl E Counsell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

6.  Impact of NICE guidance on laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernias: analysis of interrupted time series.

Authors:  Karen Bloor; Nick Freemantle; Zarnie Khadjesari; Alan Maynard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-15

7.  Views of Directors of Public Health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: results of a postal survey. National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

Authors:  Elizabeth Davies; Peter Littlejohns
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2002-12

Review 8.  New drug treatment for Alzheimer's disease: lessons for healthcare policy.

Authors:  D Melzer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-03-07

9.  A cost-utility analysis of interferon beta for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  D Parkin; P McNamee; A Jacoby; P Miller; S Thomas; D Bates
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Ruling on interferon beta will hit all health authorities.

Authors:  C Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-19
View more
  9 in total

1.  Drugs, money and society (Part II).

Authors:  Tom Walley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  NICE: managing conflict.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Jill Manthorpe
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An update for 2013 Clinical Features, Pathophysiology, Management and Therapeutic Trials.

Authors:  Paul H Gordon
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 4.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Paul H Gordon
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Use of medicines that influence falls or fractures in a residential home setting.

Authors:  Michael Wilcock; Doug MacMahon; Anthony Woolf
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06

Review 6.  Risk sharing arrangements for pharmaceuticals: potential considerations and recommendations for European payers.

Authors:  Jakub Adamski; Brian Godman; Gabriella Ofierska-Sujkowska; Bogusława Osińska; Harald Herholz; Kamila Wendykowska; Ott Laius; Saira Jan; Catherine Sermet; Corrine Zara; Marija Kalaba; Roland Gustafsson; Kristina Garuolienè; Alan Haycox; Silvio Garattini; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Risk-Sharing Agreements in the EU: A Systematic Review of Major Trends.

Authors:  Trevor Jozef Piatkiewicz; Janine Marie Traulsen; Tove Holm-Larsen
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-06

8.  Potential to enhance the prescribing of generic drugs in patients with mental health problems in austria; implications for the future.

Authors:  Brian Godman; Anna Bucsics; Thomas Burkhardt; Jutta Piessnegger; Manuela Schmitzer; Corrado Barbui; Emanuel Raschi; Marion Bennie; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David Yamamoto; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2012-12-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.