Literature DB >> 14729746

Effect of moxifloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin treatment on the mortality of mice infected intravenously with different strains of Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli.

Reiner Schaumann1, Rosemarie Blatz, Joerg Beer, Grit Ackermann, Arne C Rodloff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of moxifloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin (hereafter referred to as imipenem) treatment on the mortality of mice infected intravenously with different strains of Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli.
METHODS: Groups of 20 mice each were infected intravenously with different strains of B. fragilis [moxifloxacin and imipenem susceptible or resistant, and enterotoxin (ET) positive or negative] and E. coli (moxifloxacin and imipenem susceptible). Twenty-four hours post-infection, intravenous therapy with either moxifloxacin (2.0 mg twice a day) or imipenem (2.4 mg three times a day) was started and continued for 3 days. Control groups were left untreated. Survival rates were recorded at day 7 post-infection. At that time, surviving mice were killed and numbers of bacteria in the liver and kidneys were determined.
RESULTS: If compared with untreated animals, mice treated with either moxifloxacin or imipenem showed significantly improved survival (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference (P = 0.97) in the survival rates comparing the two treatment regimens irrespective of the ET positivity or the susceptibility to moxifloxacin or imipenem of the infective B. fragilis strain. However, there was a tendency that B. fragilis was recovered more often from the liver and kidneys of mice infected with ET positive strains.
CONCLUSIONS: The data show that moxifloxacin was as efficacious as imipenem in reducing the mortality rate of mice suffering from a severe systemic aerobic/anaerobic infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14729746     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  5 in total

1.  In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against 923 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Ellie J C Goldstein; Diane M Citron; Yumi A Warren; Kerin L Tyrrell; C Vreni Merriam; Helen Fernandez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Clinical and microbiological efficacy of moxifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in severe odontogenic abscesses: a pilot study.

Authors:  B Al-Nawas; C Walter; T Morbach; N Seitner; E Siegel; M Maeurer; F Krummenauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against anaerobes studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Alan R Noel; Karen E Bowker; Alasdair P Macgowan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of moxifloxacin in intervention therapy for intra-abdominal abscess.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Heino Stass; Heinz Delesen; Dagmar Kubitza; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Effects of exposure of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 027 and 001 to fluoroquinolones in a human gut model.

Authors:  Katie Saxton; Simon D Baines; Jane Freeman; Rachael O'Connor; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.