Literature DB >> 14729631

Significant differences in the effects of magnetic field exposure on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesis in two substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats.

Maren Fedrowitz1, Kenji Kamino, Wolfgang Löscher.   

Abstract

We have shown previously (S. Thun-Battersby et al., Cancer Res., 59: 3627-3633, 1999) that power-line frequency (50-Hz) magnetic fields (MFs) at micro T-flux densities enhance mammary gland tumor development and growth in the 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) model of breast cancer in female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. We also demonstrated that MF exposure results in an enhanced proliferative activity of the mammary epithelium of SD rats (M. Fedrowitz et al., Cancer Res., 62: 1356-1363, 2002), which is a likely explanation for the cocarcinogenic or tumor-promoting effects of MF exposure in the DMBA model. However, in contrast with our data, in a similar study conducted by Battelle in the United States, no evidence for a cocarcinogenic or tumor-promoting effect of MF exposure was found in the DMBA model in SD rats (L. E. Anderson et al., Carcinogenesis, 20: 1615-1620, 1999). Probably the most important difference between our and the Battelle studies was the use of different substrains of SD rats; the United States rats were much more susceptible to DMBA than the rats used in our studies. This prompted us to compare different substrains of SD outbred rats in our laboratory in respect to MF effects on cell proliferation in the mammary gland, susceptibility to DMBA-induced mammary cancer, and MF effects on mammary tumor development and growth in the DMBA model. The SD substrain (termed "SD1") used in all of our previous studies was considered MF-sensitive and used for comparison with another substrain ("SD2") obtained from the same breeder. In contrast with SD1 rats, no enhanced cell proliferation was determined after MF exposure in SD2 rats. MF exposure significantly increased mammary tumor development and growth in SD1 but not SD2 rats. These data indicate that the genetic background plays a pivotal role in effects of MF exposure. Different strains or substrains of rats may serve to evaluate the genetic factors underlying sensitivity to cocarcinogenic or tumor-promoting effects of MF exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14729631     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  8 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayazit; Banu Bayram; Zeydin Pala; Ozkan Atan
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Low dose magnetic fields do not cause oxidative DNA damage in human placental cotyledons in vitro.

Authors:  Maciej Lopucki; Ivo Schmerold; Agnes Dadak; Henryk Wiktor; Hans Niedermüller; Marta Kankofer
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 4.  The relevance of inter- and intrastrain differences in mice and rats and their implications for models of seizures and epilepsy.

Authors:  Wolfgang Löscher; Russell J Ferland; Thomas N Ferraro
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.937

5.  Occupational carcinogens: ELF MFs.

Authors:  Kjell Hanson Mild; Mats-Olof Mattsso; Lennart Hardell; Joseph D Bowman; Michael Kundi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Effects of long-term 50Hz power-line frequency electromagnetic field on cell behavior in Balb/c 3T3 cells.

Authors:  Guang-Zhou An; Hui Xu; Yan Zhou; Le Du; Xia Miao; Da-Peng Jiang; Kang-Chu Li; Guo-Zhen Guo; Chen Zhang; Gui-Rong Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Moderate strength (0.23-0.28 T) static magnetic fields (SMF) modulate signaling and differentiation in human embryonic cells.

Authors:  Zhiyun Wang; Anshu Sarje; Pao-Lin Che; Kevin J Yarema
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.