Literature DB >> 14729296

Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Shelley E Ellis1, Theodore Speroff, Robert S Dittus, Anne Brown, James W Pichert, Tom A Elasy.   

Abstract

Diabetes education has largely been accepted in diabetes care. The effect of diabetes education on glycemic control and the components of education responsible for such an effect are uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of diabetes patient education published between 1990 and December 2000 to quantitatively assess and characterize the effect of patient education on glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Additionally, we used meta-regression to analyze which variables within an education intervention that best explained variance in glycemic control. Twenty-eight educational interventions (n=2439) were included in the analysis. The net glycemic change was 0.320% lower in the intervention group than in the control group. Meta-regression revealed that interventions which included a face-to-face delivery, cognitive reframing teaching method, and exercise content were more likely to improve glycemic control. Those three areas collectively explained 44% of the variance in glycemic control. Current patient education interventions modestly improve glycemic control in adults with diabetes. We highlight three potential components of educational interventions that may predict an increased likelihood of success in ameliorating glycemic control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14729296     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  117 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  A psychoeducational intervention (SWEEP) for depressed women with diabetes.

Authors:  Sue M Penckofer; Carol Ferrans; Patricia Mumby; Mary Byrn; Mary Ann Emanuele; Patrick R Harrison; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Patrick Lustman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-10

4.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Meta-analysis does not allow appraisal of complex interventions in diabetes and hypertension self-management: a methodological review.

Authors:  M Lenz; A Steckelberg; B Richter; I Mühlhauser
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Metabolic effects of interventions to increase exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  V S Conn; A R Hafdahl; D R Mehr; J W LeMaster; S A Brown; P J Nielsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  [Diabetes education in adult diabetic patients].

Authors:  Raimund Weitgasser; Martin Clodi; Gertrud Kacerovsky-Bielesz; Peter Grafinger; Monika Lechleitner; Kinga Howorka; Bernhard Ludvik
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 10.  National standards for diabetes self-management education.

Authors:  Martha M Funnell; Tammy L Brown; Belinda P Childs; Linda B Haas; Gwen M Hosey; Brian Jensen; Melinda Maryniuk; Mark Peyrot; John D Piette; Diane Reader; Linda M Siminerio; Katie Weinger; Michael A Weiss
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.