Literature DB >> 14728997

The case against antipsychotic drugs: a 50-year record of doing more harm than good.

Robert Whitaker1.   

Abstract

Although the standard of care in developed countries is to maintain schizophrenia patients on neuroleptics, this practice is not supported by the 50-year research record for the drugs. A critical review reveals that this paradigm of care worsens long-term outcomes, at least in the aggregate, and that 40% or more of all schizophrenia patients would fare better if they were not so medicated. Evidence-based care would require the selective use of antipsychotics, based on two principles: (a). no immediate neuroleptisation of first-episode patients; (b). every patient stabilized on neuroleptics should be given an opportunity to gradually withdraw from them. This model would dramatically increase recovery rates and decrease the percentage of patients who become chronically ill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14728997     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-9877(03)00293-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  11 in total

1.  Long term outcome of treating schizophrenia.

Authors:  Trevor Howard Turner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-06

2.  Drug-induced supersensitivity psychosis revisited: characteristics of relapse in treatment-compliant patients.

Authors:  Paul Fallon; Serdar Dursun; Bill Deakin
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-02

3.  Powerful choices: peer support and individualized medication self-determination.

Authors:  Corinna West
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Weighing the evidence for harm from long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy Sohler; Ben G Adams; David M Barnes; Gregory H Cohen; Seth J Prins; Sharon Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2015-12-14

5.  Do antipsychotics limit disability in schizophrenia? A naturalistic comparative study in the community.

Authors:  Jagadisha Thirthalli; Basappa K Venkatesh; Magadi N Naveen; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Udupi Arunachala; Kengeri V Kishore Kumar; Bangalore N Gangadhar
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Study protocol: a mixed methods study to assess mental health recovery, shared decision-making and quality of life (Plan4Recovery).

Authors:  Michael Coffey; Ben Hannigan; Alan Meudell; Julian Hunt; Deb Fitzsimmons
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Nafiso Ahmed; Sally Barlow; Lisa Reynolds; Nicholas Drey; Fareha Begum; Elizabeth Tuudah; Alan Simpson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Effects of Recovery-Orientation on the Use of Forced Medication and Maximum Daily Drug Dose: The "Weddinger Modell".

Authors:  Klara Czernin; Felix Bermpohl; Alexandre Wullschleger; Lieselotte Mahler
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Explaining attitudes and adherence to antipsychotic medication: the development of a process model.

Authors:  Martin Wiesjahn; Esther Jung; Fabian Lamster; Winfried Rief; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Schizophr Res Treatment       Date:  2014-02-19

10.  Ordinary risks and accepted fictions: how contrasting and competing priorities work in risk assessment and mental health care planning.

Authors:  Michael Coffey; Rachel Cohen; Alison Faulkner; Ben Hannigan; Alan Simpson; Sally Barlow
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.