Nandini Dendukuri1, Jane McCusker, Eric Belzile. 1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Canada. epidemiology.st-mary@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool for detecting severe functional impairment and depression and predicting increased depressive symptoms and increased utilization of health services. SETTING:Four university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal. DESIGN: Data from two previous studies were available: Study 1, in which the ISAR scale was developed (n=1,122), and Study 2, in which it was used to identify patients for a randomized trial of a nursing intervention (n=1,889 with administrative data, of which 520 also had clinical data). PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older who were to be released from an emergency department (ED). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline validation criteria included premorbid functional status in both studies and depression in Study 2 only. Increase in depressive symptoms at 4-month follow-up was assessed in Study 2. Information on health services utilization during the 5 months after the ED visit (repeat ED visits and hospitalization in both studies, visits to community health centers in Study 2) was available by linkage with administrative databases. RESULTS: Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for concurrent validity of the ISAR scale for severe functional impairment and depression ranged from 0.65 to 0.86. Estimates of the AUC for predictive validity for increased depressive symptoms and high utilization of health services ranged from 0.61 to 0.71. CONCLUSION: The ISAR scale has acceptable to excellent concurrent and predictive validity for a variety of outcomes, including clinical measures and utilization of health services.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool for detecting severe functional impairment and depression and predicting increased depressive symptoms and increased utilization of health services. SETTING: Four university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal. DESIGN: Data from two previous studies were available: Study 1, in which the ISAR scale was developed (n=1,122), and Study 2, in which it was used to identify patients for a randomized trial of a nursing intervention (n=1,889 with administrative data, of which 520 also had clinical data). PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older who were to be released from an emergency department (ED). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline validation criteria included premorbid functional status in both studies and depression in Study 2 only. Increase in depressive symptoms at 4-month follow-up was assessed in Study 2. Information on health services utilization during the 5 months after the ED visit (repeat ED visits and hospitalization in both studies, visits to community health centers in Study 2) was available by linkage with administrative databases. RESULTS: Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for concurrent validity of the ISAR scale for severe functional impairment and depression ranged from 0.65 to 0.86. Estimates of the AUC for predictive validity for increased depressive symptoms and high utilization of health services ranged from 0.61 to 0.71. CONCLUSION: The ISAR scale has acceptable to excellent concurrent and predictive validity for a variety of outcomes, including clinical measures and utilization of health services.
Authors: U Thiem; H W Greuel; A Reingräber; P Koch-Gwinner; R Püllen; H J Heppner; M Pfisterer Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.281
Authors: F Salvi; V Morichi; A Grilli; L Lancioni; L Spazzafumo; S Polonara; A M Abbatecola; G De Tommaso; P Dessi-Fulgheri; F Lattanzio Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: R M J Warnier; E van Rossum; E van Velthuijsen; W J Mulder; J M G A Schols; G I J M Kempen Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Tobias Freund; Michel Wensing; Stefan Geissler; Frank Peters-Klimm; Cornelia Mahler; Cynthia M Boyd; Joachim Szecsenyi Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Bianca M Buurman; Jita G Hoogerduijn; Elisabeth A van Gemert; Rob J de Haan; Marieke J Schuurmans; Sophia E de Rooij Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240