Literature DB >> 14728148

Pediatricians and personal digital assistants: what type are they using?

Aaron E Carroll1, Dimitri A Christakis.   

Abstract

Increasing attention is being focused on the potential benefits of personal digital assistants (PDA) in medical practice. Although some work has been done to investigate their use, it is still unclear what types of PDAs are being used by pediatricians, and if they are using different types in different ways. Our goals were to determine: (1) which kinds of PDAs were being used by pediatricians; (2) if the personal or professional characteristics of pediatricians differ by type of PDA they are using; (3) if the types of applications they employ differ by the type of PDAs they are using. We randomly selected 2130 pediatricians from the AMA masterfile of United States licensed physicians and surveyed them. Of those respondents that reported using a PDA, 89.7% use a Palm OS based system, 8.9% use a Pocket PC based system, and 1.4% used neither. Residents were significantly more likely to use a Palm OS based PDA than non residents (OR 6.32, 95%CI 1.41-27.53). There were significant associations between the PDA platform being used and types of applications being run on them. More than one third of pediatricians are using PDAs in clinical practice. Palm OS based systems are much more prevalent in clinical practice, and the choice of newer pediatricians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728148      PMCID: PMC1479942     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  17 in total

1.  Wireless clinical alerts for physiologic, laboratory and medication data.

Authors:  M M Shabot; M LoBue; J Chen
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Assessing the implementation process.

Authors:  C Weir; C McCarthy; S Gohlinghorst; R Crockett
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges.

Authors:  M Berg
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rothschild; Thomas H Lee; Taran Bae; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Use of the personal digital assistant for point-of-care trauma documentation.

Authors:  L Eastes
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients.

Authors:  R Kaushal; D W Bates; C Landrigan; K J McKenna; M D Clapp; F Federico; D A Goldmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A personal digital assistant for determination of fluid needs for burn patients.

Authors:  A C Roth; M A Leon; S M Milner; R L Herting; A W Hahn
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  1997

8.  Emergency medicine resident patient care documentation using a hand-held computerized device.

Authors:  S B Bird; R S Zarum; F P Renzi
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Family practice clerkship encounters documented with structured phrases on paper and hand-held computer logs.

Authors:  M Marshall; W Sumner
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

10.  Why implementing EPR's does not bring about organizational changes--a qualitative approach.

Authors:  R E Nikula
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001
View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrating multiple clinical information systems using the Java message service framework to enable the delivery of urgent exam results at the point of care.

Authors:  Wyatt M Tellis; Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Perception and Usage of Point of Care Devices: A Cross-sectional Study Targeting Residents and Trainers in Oman.

Authors:  Amna Al Harrasi; Laila Mohammed Al Mbeihsi; Abdulhakeem Al Rawahi; Mohammed Al Shafaee
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2021-01-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.