Literature DB >> 14728147

Putting data integration into practice: using biomedical terminologies to add structure to existing data sources.

Michael N Cantor1, Yves A Lussier.   

Abstract

A major purpose of biomedical terminologies is to provide uniform concept representation, allowing for improved methods of analysis of biomedical information. While this goal is being realized in bioinformatics, with the emergence of the Gene Ontology as a standard, there is still no real standard for the representation of clinical concepts. As discoveries in biology and clinical medicine move from parallel to intersecting paths, standardized representation will become more important. A large portion of significant data, however, is mainly represented as free text, upon which conducting computer-based inferencing is nearly impossible. In order to test our hypothesis that existing biomedical terminologies, specifically the UMLS Metathesaurus and SNOMED CT, could be used as templates to implement semantic and logical relationships over free text data that is important both clinically and biologically, we chose to analyze OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man). After finding OMIM entries' conceptual equivalents in each respective terminology, we extracted the semantic relationships that were present and evaluated a subset of them for semantic, logical, and biological legitimacy. Our study reveals the possibility of putting the knowledge present in biomedical terminologies to its intended use, with potentially clinically significant consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728147      PMCID: PMC1480054     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  8 in total

1.  A general method for sifting linguistic knowledge from structured terminologies.

Authors:  N Grabar; P Zweigenbaum
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Normal forms for description logic expressions of clinical concepts in SNOMED RT.

Authors:  K A Spackman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Linking biomedical language information and knowledge resources: GO and UMLS.

Authors:  I N Sarkar; M N Cantor; R Gelman; F Hartel; Y A Lussier
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2003

4.  Models-of-data and models-of-processes in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Scale and context: issues in ontologies to link health- and bio-informatics.

Authors:  Alan L Rector; Jeremy Rogers; Angus Roberts; Chris Wroe
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

6.  In silico biology through "omics".

Authors:  Bernhard Palsson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 7.  Large-scale open bioinformatics data resources.

Authors:  Elia Stupka
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2002-06

8.  Biomedical database inter-connectivity: an experiment linking MIM, GENBANK, and META-1 via MEDLINE.

Authors:  W D Sperzel; R M Abarbanel; S J Nelson; M S Erlbaum; D D Sherertz; M S Tuttle; N E Olson; L F Fuller
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Mining OMIM for insight into complex diseases.

Authors:  Michael N Cantor; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

2.  Terminological mapping for high throughput comparative biology of phenotypes.

Authors:  Y A Lussier; J Li
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2004

3.  Visualizing information across multidimensional post-genomic structured and textual databases.

Authors:  Ying Tao; Carol Friedman; Yves A Lussier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Randolph A Miller; Kevin B Johnson; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Variation of SNOMED CT coding of clinical research concepts among coding experts.

Authors:  James E Andrews; Rachel L Richesson; Jeffrey Krischer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A model for evaluating interface terminologies.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Randolph A Miller; Kevin B Johnson; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Clinical research informatics: a conceptual perspective.

Authors:  Michael G Kahn; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Resources for comparing the speed and performance of medical autocoders.

Authors:  Jules J Berman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Tumor taxonomy for the developmental lineage classification of neoplasms.

Authors:  Jules J Berman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.