Literature DB >> 14727802

Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery.

Gary L Ellison1, Joan L Warren, Kevin B Knopf, Martin L Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery in a large population of Medicare patients. DATA SOURCES: We used a large population-based dataset: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) linked to Medicare data. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed data from 44,768 non-Hispanic white, 2,921 black, and 4,416 patients from other racial/ethnic groups, aged 65 and older at diagnosis, who had a diagnosis of local or regional colorectal cancer between 1986 and 1996, and were followed through December 31, 1998. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to investigate the relation of race and receipt of posttreatment bowel surveillance. DATA COLLECTION: Sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics were collected at the time of diagnosis for all members of the cohort. Surgery and bowel surveillance with colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema were obtained from Medicare claims using ICD-9-CM and CPT-4 codes. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The chance of surveillance within 18 months of surgery was 57 percent, 48 percent, and 45 percent for non-Hispanic whites, blacks, and others, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics, blacks were 25 percent less likely than whites to receive surveillance if diagnosed between 1991 and 1996 (RR = 0.75, 95 percent CI = 0.70-0.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive posttreatment bowel surveillance and this result was not explained by measured racial differences in sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics. More research is needed to explore the influences of patient- and provider-level factors on racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14727802      PMCID: PMC1360978          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00207.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  39 in total

1.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group.

Authors:  S J Winawer; E T Stewart; A G Zauber; J H Bond; H Ansel; J D Waye; D Hall; J A Hamlin; M Schapiro; M J O'Brien; S S Sternberg; L S Gottlieb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Racial and ethnic differences in access to medical care.

Authors:  R M Mayberry; F Mili; E Ofili
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  K B Knopf; J L Warren; E J Feuer; M L Brown
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Sociodemographic differences in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance care following treatment with curative intent.

Authors:  J Elston Lafata; C Cole Johnson; T Ben-Menachem; R J Morlock
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  L Cooper-Patrick; J J Gallo; J J Gonzales; H T Vu; N R Powe; C Nelson; D E Ford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Variations in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive colon cancer in the elderly: a population-based study.

Authors:  V Sundararajan; V R Grann; J S Jacobson; H Ahsan; A I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Age and adjuvant chemotherapy use after surgery for stage III colon cancer.

Authors:  D Schrag; L D Cramer; P B Bach; C B Begg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  C E Desch; A B Benson; T J Smith; P J Flynn; C Krause; C L Loprinzi; B D Minsky; N J Petrelli; D G Pfister; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G S Cooper; Z Yuan; A Chak; A A Rimm
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels.

Authors:  S F Jencks; T Cuerdon; D R Burwen; B Fleming; P M Houck; A E Kussmaul; D S Nilasena; D L Ordin; D R Arday
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  29 in total

1.  Routine preventive care and cancer surveillance in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol LTS-01.

Authors:  Hiroko Kunitake; Ping Zheng; Greg Yothers; Stephanie R Land; Louis Fehrenbacher; Jeffrey K Giguere; D Lawrence Wickerham; Lawrence Wickerham; Patricia A Ganz; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Nasolacrimal duct closure modulates ocular mucosal and systemic CD4(+) T-cell responses induced following topical ocular or intranasal immunization.

Authors:  Aziz Alami Chentoufi; Gargi Dasgupta; Anthony B Nesburn; Ilham Bettahi; Nicholas R Binder; Zareen S Choudhury; Winston D Chamberlain; Steven L Wechsler; Lbachir BenMohamed
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-01-20

4.  Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival: to what extent are racial disparities explained by differences in treatment, tumor characteristics, or hospital characteristics?

Authors:  Arica White; Sally W Vernon; Luisa Franzini; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

Review 6.  Ethnic disparities in colonoscopy use among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Heidi Woo; Tatiana D Starr; Lina H Jandorf; Katherine N DuHamel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Variation in use of surveillance colonoscopy among colorectal cancer survivors in the United States.

Authors:  Talya Salz; Morris Weinberger; John Z Ayanian; Noel T Brewer; Craig C Earle; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Deborah A Fisher; Bryan J Weiner; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Sally W Vernon; L Kay Bartholomew; Caitlin C Murphy; Shirley M Bluethmann
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  A qualitative assessment of implementing a cross-cultural survey on cancer wards in Denmark--a description of barriers.

Authors:  Maria Kristiansen; Amani Hassani; Allan Krasnik
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.