Literature DB >> 14725810

Comparison of single and multiple sieve methods for the determination of masticatory performance.

A van der Bilt1, F A Fontijn-Tekamp.   

Abstract

In the majority of studies on masticatory performance, the degree of food breakdown has been determined by sieving the food with one or more sieves. The aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained with a single and a multiple sieve method, as these methods have never been compared. We analysed the chewed food of 176 dentate subjects with a single and a multiple sieve method. Furthermore, we quantified the influence of age, gender, and dental status on the masticatory performance in order to compare the sensitivity of both methods. We observed a significant influence of the number of occlusal units on the masticatory performance for both methods. The single sieve method is less reliable than the multiple sieve method if the sieve diameter is not close enough to the median particle size of the chewed food. Therefore, we recommend the multiple sieve method.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14725810     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2003.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  8 in total

1.  Mastication improvement after partial implant-supported prosthesis use.

Authors:  T M S V Gonçalves; C H Campos; G M Gonçalves; M de Moraes; R C M Rodrigues Garcia
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Masticatory function after bite-raising with light-cured orthodontic band cement in healthy adults.

Authors:  Chidsanu Changsiripun; Darin Pativetpinyo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Mini dental assessment: a simple screening test for non-dental staff.

Authors:  B Wöstmann; M Seelbach; P Seelbach; A Podhorsky; G F Kolb; R G Bretzel; P Rehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Masticatory efficiency in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  D Bakarčić; V Lajnert; N I Jokić; R Gržić
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Influence of time and different tooth widths on masticatory efficiency and muscular activity in bilateral free-end saddles.

Authors:  Mohammed Assayed Mousa; Edward Lynch; Mohd G Sghaireen; Abdalwhab M A Zwiri; Osama A Baraka
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Methods for objectively assessing clinical masticatory performance: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Per Elgestad Stjernfeldt; Inger Wårdh; Mats Trulsson; Gerd Faxén Irving; Anne-Marie Boström
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-26

7.  Impact of occlusal support and perceived chewing ability on oral health-related quality of life among patients attending a private dental institution in India.

Authors:  Seebu Dhingra; Gururaghavendran Rajesh; Ashwini Rao; Umesh Y Pai; Ramya Shenoy; Mithun Pai
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

8.  Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of chewing-function questionnaire CFQ-ALB.

Authors:  Venera Bimbashi; Gloria Staka; Asja Čelebić; Flurije Hoxha; Kujtim Shala; Nikola Petričević
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.186

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.