Literature DB >> 14724556

Applying public health strategies to primary immunodeficiency diseases: a potential approach to genetic disorders.

Mary Lou Lindegren1, Lisa Kobrynski, Sonja A Rasmussen, Cynthia A Moore, Scott D Grosse, Marsha Lynne Vanderford, Thomas J Spira, J Steven McDougal, Robert F Vogt, W Harry Hannon, Lisa V Kalman, Bin Chen, Marifran Mattson, Timothy G Baker, Muin Khoury.   

Abstract

Primary immunodeficiency (PI) diseases are a group of primarily single-gene disorders of the immune system. Approximately 100 separate PI diseases have been described, but <20 probably account for >90% of cases. Although diverse, PI diseases share the common feature of susceptibility to infection and result in substantial morbidity and shortened life spans. Most important, prompt diagnosis and treatment can now lead to life-saving treatment and result in marked improvements in the quality and length of life for persons with PI diseases. In November 2001, a workshop was convened by CDC in Atlanta, Georgia, to discuss ways to improve health outcomes among persons with PI disease. A multidisciplinary panel of persons knowledgeable in PI diseases and public health met to identify and discuss public health strategies that can be applied to PI diseases and possibly for other genetic disorders. A systematic assessment based on the established public health framework was applied to the growing group of PI diseases, whose diverse genetic mutations span multiple components of the immune system but all lead to increased incidence and severity of infections. During the meeting, specialists in clinical immunology, public health, genetics, pediatrics, health communication, and ethics from state and federal agencies, academic centers, professional organizations, and advocacy foundations discussed the four components of the public health framework as they relate to PI diseases. These four components include 1) public health assessment (application of traditional public health methods to assess the occurrence and impact of PI diseases on communities); 2) population-based interventions (development, implementation, and evaluation of screening tests administered to newborns and clinical algorithms for early recognition of symptomatic persons to facilitate the earliest possible diagnosis and treatment for PI diseases); 3) evaluation of screening and diagnostic tools (to ensure their quality and appropriateness for identification of patients with PI diseases); and 4) communication (communication with and information dissemination to health-care providers and the public to facilitate prompt and appropriate diagnosis and intervention). The working group's deliberations focused on challenges and opportunities, priority research questions, and recommendations for future action for these four components. These recommendations, developed by workshop participants, will be useful to medical and public health professionals who are evaluating methods to increase recognition of PI diseases and other genetic disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14724556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep        ISSN: 1057-5987


  38 in total

1.  Neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 2.  The long quest for neonatal screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Rebecca H Buckley
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Laboratory technology for population-based screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in neonates: the winner is T-cell receptor excision circles.

Authors:  Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Early vs. delayed diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency: a family perspective survey.

Authors:  Alice Chan; Christopher Scalchunes; Marcia Boyle; Jennifer M Puck
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  An immune globulin intravenous (human), 10% liquid privigen: for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases.

Authors: 
Journal:  P T       Date:  2009-06

6.  Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.

Authors:  Anne Andermann; Ingeborg Blancquaert; Sylvie Beauchamp; Véronique Déry
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Privigen immune globulin intravenous (human), 10% liquid.

Authors: 
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-08

Review 8.  Recommendations for live viral and bacterial vaccines in immunodeficient patients and their close contacts.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Thomas A Fleisher; Rebecca H Buckley; Zuhair Ballas; Mark Ballow; R Michael Blaese; Francisco A Bonilla; Mary Ellen Conley; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Alexandra H Filipovich; Ramsay Fuleihan; Erwin W Gelfand; Vivian Hernandez-Trujillo; Steven M Holland; Richard Hong; Howard M Lederman; Harry L Malech; Stephen Miles; Luigi D Notarangelo; Hans D Ochs; Jordan S Orange; Jennifer M Puck; John M Routes; E Richard Stiehm; Kathleen Sullivan; Troy Torgerson; Jerry Winkelstein
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Primary immunodeficiency diseases worldwide: more common than generally thought.

Authors:  Ahmed Aziz Bousfiha; Leïla Jeddane; Fatima Ailal; Ibtihal Benhsaien; Nizar Mahlaoui; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Laurent Abel
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 8.317

10.  Cellular calibrators to quantitate T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) in clinical samples.

Authors:  Divya Punwani; Diana Gonzalez-Espinosa; Anne Marie Comeau; Amalia Dutra; Evgenia Pak; Jennifer Puck
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.