BACKGROUND: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation markedly improved with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction amplification of EBV DNA and visualization of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells with peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tetramers. We decided to combine these methods to evaluate posttransplant EBV reactivation and rituximab therapy. METHODS: We followed 56 patients treated with an HLA-genoidentical sibling (n=32), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=19), or an unrelated cord-blood transplant (n=5). EBV DNA was quantified in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Patient CD8+ T cells were stained with a panel of eight tetramers. RESULTS: EBV DNA was detected in half of the patients, mainly in the MUD group (17/19). In 19 patients, viral DNA was detected only in the cellular compartment. All patients who controlled reactivation without rituximab and despite a viral load of greater than 500 genome equivalents (gEq)/150,000 PBMC mounted an EBV-specific CD8+ T-cell response in greater than 1.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells. Plasmatic EBV genome was found in nine patients preceded by a high cellular viral load. Three of these patients controlled the reactivation before or without the introduction of rituximab, and they all developed a significant and increasing EBV-specific T-cell response. Patients with EBV-specific T cells at the onset of reactivation controlled viral reactivation without rituximab. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the benefit of an early and close monitoring of EBV reactivation and CD8+-specific immune responses to initiate rituximab only when necessary and before the immune response becomes overwhelmed by the viral burden.
BACKGROUND: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation markedly improved with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction amplification of EBV DNA and visualization of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells with peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tetramers. We decided to combine these methods to evaluate posttransplant EBV reactivation and rituximab therapy. METHODS: We followed 56 patients treated with an HLA-genoidentical sibling (n=32), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=19), or an unrelated cord-blood transplant (n=5). EBV DNA was quantified in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Patient CD8+ T cells were stained with a panel of eight tetramers. RESULTS:EBV DNA was detected in half of the patients, mainly in the MUD group (17/19). In 19 patients, viral DNA was detected only in the cellular compartment. All patients who controlled reactivation without rituximab and despite a viral load of greater than 500 genome equivalents (gEq)/150,000 PBMC mounted an EBV-specific CD8+ T-cell response in greater than 1.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells. Plasmatic EBV genome was found in nine patients preceded by a high cellular viral load. Three of these patients controlled the reactivation before or without the introduction of rituximab, and they all developed a significant and increasing EBV-specific T-cell response. Patients with EBV-specific T cells at the onset of reactivation controlled viral reactivation without rituximab. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the benefit of an early and close monitoring of EBV reactivation and CD8+-specific immune responses to initiate rituximab only when necessary and before the immune response becomes overwhelmed by the viral burden.
Authors: Karen K Ballen; Corey Cutler; Beow Y Yeap; Steven L McAfee; Bimalangshu R Dey; Eyal C Attar; Yi-Bin Chen; Richard L Haspel; Deborah Liney; John Koreth; Vincent Ho; Edwin P Alyea; Robert J Soiffer; Thomas R Spitzer; Joseph H Antin Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Claudio G Brunstein; Daniel J Weisdorf; Todd DeFor; Juliet N Barker; Jakub Tolar; Jo-Anne H van Burik; John E Wagner Journal: Blood Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Anne H Blaes; Qing Cao; John E Wagner; Jo-Anne H Young; Daniel J Weisdorf; Claudio G Brunstein Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Elena Sandalova; Diletta Laccabue; Carolina Boni; Anthony T Tan; Katja Fink; Eng Eong Ooi; Robert Chua; Bahar Shafaeddin Schreve; Carlo Ferrari; Antonio Bertoletti Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Helen E Heslop; Karen S Slobod; Martin A Pule; Gregory A Hale; Alexandra Rousseau; Colton A Smith; Catherine M Bollard; Hao Liu; Meng-Fen Wu; Richard J Rochester; Persis J Amrolia; Julia L Hurwitz; Malcolm K Brenner; Cliona M Rooney Journal: Blood Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer A Kanakry; Aparna M Hegde; Christine M Durand; Allan B Massie; Amy E Greer; Richard F Ambinder; Alexandra Valsamakis Journal: Blood Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 22.113