Literature DB >> 14723861

Measurement of abdominal muscle thickness using M-mode ultrasound imaging during functional activities.

Steve M Bunce1, Alan D Hough, Ann P Moore.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging has been previously utilized in the measurement of muscle thickness and cross-sectional area in research studies, and advocated as a clinical biofeedback tool in the rehabilitation of transversus abdominis function following episodes of low back pain. This paper describes how the thickness of the abdominal muscles can be quantified with a new measurement technique using M-mode ultrasound. The technique uses a custom-made transducer holder that facilitates measurement of muscle thickness changes during functional activity. Limitations of the technique and potential future applications are discussed. The M-mode ultrasound technique may provide an effective method for the non-invasive measurement of abdominal muscle thickness during functional activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723861     DOI: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00069-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  10 in total

1.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Altered response of the anterolateral abdominal muscles to simulated weight-bearing in subjects with low back pain.

Authors:  Julie A Hides; Daniel L Belavý; Lana Cassar; Michelle Williams; Stephen J Wilson; Carolyn A Richardson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A physiotherapy perspective of musculoskeletal imaging in sport.

Authors:  M J Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Ultrasound assessment of transversus abdominis muscle contraction ratio during abdominal hollowing: a useful tool to distinguish between patients with chronic low back pain and healthy controls?

Authors:  N Pulkovski; A F Mannion; F Caporaso; V Toma; D Gubler; D Helbling; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The role of ultrasound in diagnosis of the causes of low back pain: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pedram Heidari; Farzin Farahbakhsh; Mohsen Rostami; Pardis Noormohammadpour; Ramin Kordi
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-19

6.  Comparison of contraction rates of abdominal muscles of chronic low back pain patients in different postures.

Authors:  Sung-Hak Cho; Kang Hoon Kim; Il-Hun Baek; Bong-Oh Goo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2013-09-20

7.  Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study.

Authors:  Nahid Tahan; Khosro Khademi-Kalantari; Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei; Saeed Mikaili; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonography to measure transverse abdominis and multifidus muscle dimensions.

Authors:  Narjes Nabavi; Zahra Mosallanezhad; Hamid Reza Haghighatkhah; Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpeid
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Effects of isometric exercise using biofeedback on maximum voluntary isometric contraction, pain, and muscle thickness in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yun Lak Choi; Bo Kyung Kim; Yong Pil Hwang; Ok Kon Moon; Wan Suk Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-01-09

10.  Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Manual Versus Specific Device Transcostal Measurements for Breathing Diaphragm Thickness by Ultrasonography in Lumbopelvic Pain Athletes.

Authors:  Daniel Marugán-Rubio; Jose L Chicharro; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; David Rodríguez-Sanz; Davinia Vicente-Campos; Gabriel J Dávila-Sánchez; César Calvo-Lobo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.