Literature DB >> 14723782

Has exercise an antifracture efficacy in women?

Magnus Karlsson1.   

Abstract

Exercise in girls during growth seems to confer a high peak bone mineral density (BMD). Exercise in adulthood, in the peri- and postmenopausal period, and in old age prevents bone loss or increases BMD with a magnitude of minor biological significance. However, these changes must be regarded as beneficial compared to the age-related bone loss, which inevitably will occur if no interventions are implemented. Prospective intervention studies also suggest that exercise improves muscle strength, coordination and balance, even in elderly women, all of which are improvements with a potential of reducing the number of falls. A randomised, controlled, prospective, blinded study (the only study design that tests a hypothesis) of exercise with fracture as end point is extremely difficult to conduct, due to the large sample sizes needed. At present, no such studies exist. Retrospective and prospective observational and case-control studies suggest that physical activity in women is associated with reduced fracture risk. This may be correct, but we must never forget that a consistently replicated sampling bias may produce the same outcome. The Achilles heel of exercise is the reduction or the cessation of physical activity, which commonly occurs among middle-aged women when family and work demands reduce the time available for exercise. A higher BMD or improvement in muscle size and muscle strength achieved by exercise during adolescence seems to be eroded on retirement, leaving virtually no remaining benefits in old age, the period when fragility fractures begin to be a problem of increasing magnitude. However, recreational activities seem to maintain some of the musculo-skeletal benefits, but to date we do not know the level of activity needed to retain these benefits. Dose-response relationships need to be quantified, as also the effects on bone size, shape and architecture. Another essential question that we must address is how many fewer fractures will be the result of a community-based exercise campaign. Will efforts by the community to encourage a higher level of physical exercise, with the aim of reducing bone fractures, be cost-effective? The higher level of proof, suggesting that exercise does reduce fragility fractures and thus reduces the total cost for the society, must come from well-designed and well-executed, prospective, randomised, controlled trials. The responsibility of executing these studies lies in the hands of both researchers and the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723782     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00322.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  15 in total

1.  Effects of Small-Sided Soccer Games on Physical Fitness, Physiological Responses, and Health Indices in Untrained Individuals and Clinical Populations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hassane Zouhal; Amri Hammami; Jed M Tijani; Ayyappan Jayavel; Maysa de Sousa; Peter Krustrup; Zouita Sghaeir; Urs Granacher; Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  High-intensity resistance training and postmenopausal bone loss: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Martyn-St James; S Carroll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Sclerostin antibody prevented progressive bone loss in combined ovariectomized and concurrent functional disuse.

Authors:  Dongye Zhang; Minyi Hu; Timothy Chu; Liangjun Lin; Jingyu Wang; Xiaodong Li; Hua Zhu Ke; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The effect of vigorous physical activity and risk of wrist fracture over 25 years in a low-risk survivor cohort.

Authors:  Donna L Thorpe; Synnove F Knutsen; W Lawrence Beeson; Gary E Fraser
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Impact exercise increases BMC during growth: an 8-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine Gunter; Adam Dg Baxter-Jones; Robert L Mirwald; Hawley Almstedt; Robyn K Fuchs; Shantel Durski; Christine Snow
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  Exercise and bone mass in adults.

Authors:  Amelia Guadalupe-Grau; Teresa Fuentes; Borja Guerra; Jose A L Calbet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Physical activity and fracture risk: a prospective study of 1898 incident fractures among 34,696 British men and women.

Authors:  Paul N Appleby; Naomi E Allen; Andrew W Roddam; Timothy J Key
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Loading and skeletal development and maintenance.

Authors:  P Bergmann; J J Body; S Boonen; Y Boutsen; J P Devogelaer; S Goemaere; J Kaufman; J Y Reginster; S Rozenberg
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-12-20

9.  Bone mineral density and body composition of adult premenopausal women with three levels of physical activity.

Authors:  Fernando D Saraví; Fabiana Sayegh
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2013-02-25

10.  Intakes of selected nutrients, bone mineralisation and density of adolescent female swimmers over a three-year period.

Authors:  J Czeczelewski; B Długołęcka; E Czeczelewska; B Raczyńska
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.