Literature DB >> 14723774

Epidemiological study of gambling in the non-metropolitan region of central Queensland.

Grant Schofield1, Kerry Mummery, Wei Wang, Geoff Dickson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the research was to provide a contemporary description of the gambling behaviours of people in Central Queensland.
DESIGN: The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), a clinical diagnostic tool for identifying problem and pathological gamblers was utilised.
SETTING: Central Queensland extends from Bundaberg to Mackay and west to the Queensland-Northern Territory border. The region incorporates a number of rural and regional centres and the major centres of Rockhampton, Gladstone, Mackay and Bundaberg.
SUBJECTS: Computer-aided telephone interviews were conducted with a random sample of 1029 adults. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: a comparison of CQ gambling rates with national averages.
RESULTS: Over 90% of the population had engaged in some form of gambling activity in the past month. One point eight percent of the sample fulfilled criteria for 'problem gambling'. The prevalence of 'probable pathological gambling', was 0.8%. An additional 1% of the population were identified as being 'problem gamblers'. These rates are slightly lower than the Australian average identified by the Productivity Commission in 1999. Nonetheless, they indicate the presence of a large number of individuals affected by problem gambling.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of these data with treatment statistics available from the regional counselling service for problem gamblers indicate that the majority of these gamblers do not seek treatment. It is clear that many gamblers with serious pathology go undetected and untreated. General practitioners are suggested as one appropriate point for screening and further referral. A whole-of-government approach to problem and pathological gambling is also advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723774     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2004.00544.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  6 in total

1.  Differences in pathological gambling prevalence estimates: facts or artefacts?

Authors:  Monika Sassen; Ludwig Kraus; Gerhard Bühringer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  Prevalence of the addictions: a problem of the majority or the minority?

Authors:  Steve Sussman; Nadra Lisha; Mark Griffiths
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  SOGS and CGPI: parallel comparison on a diverse population.

Authors:  Martin Young; Matthew Stevens
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-03-08

4.  Social Costs of Gambling in the Czech Republic 2012.

Authors:  Petr Winkler; Markéta Bejdová; Ladislav Csémy; Aneta Weissová
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2017-12

5.  The vulnerable faces of pathological gambling.

Authors:  Timothy W Fong
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2005-04

Review 6.  Prevalence of adult problem and pathological gambling between 2000 and 2005: an update.

Authors:  Stephanie Stucki; Margret Rihs-Middel
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2007-01-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.