Literature DB >> 14723684

Relationship between interaction sites in the gut, hydrophobicity, mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in indigenous and exogenous bacteria.

C G Vinderola1, M Medici, G Perdigón.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate whether there is a relationship between interaction sites in the gut, hydrophobicity, mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and enterococci. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Hydrophobicity, cell wall protein profiles and sites of interaction in the gut (by using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled bacteria) were determined for Lactobacillus casei, L. acidophilus, L. fermentum, Bifidobacterium bifidum, B. animalis and Enterococcus faecalis. We also determined the number of immunoglobulin (Ig)A+, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)alpha+, interleukin (IL)-6+ and IL-10+ cells after oral administration of the above bacteria to BALB/c mice. All strains assessed were found to interact with the sites of induction of the immune response in the gut. No correlation with hydrophobicity was observed. When some strains at certain doses were administered to mice, bacterial translocation to liver was observed. The oral administration of indigenous (104 cells day(-1)) and exogenous (107 cells day(-1)) bifidobacteria and lactobacilli for 5 consecutive days activated the systemic and intestinal mucosal immune response in a strain-specific way, independently whether the strain was indigenous or exogenous in relation to the host. The differences in the immunopotentiating capacity of the various strains might be related to the differences in their cell wall protein profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous bacteria activated the mucosal immune response at a dose significantly smaller than the one required for probiotic exogenous bacteria. However, probiotic exogenous bacteria can be used at high concentrations in fermented dairy products with a great impact on the immune system, favouring its immunomodulation. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The immunomodulation capacity of probiotic bacteria is strain specific and independent of the specificity of the host. The ability of certain strains to down-regulate the production and release of IL-6 by IL-10 may have potential implications in their use in cases in which cytokine deregulation or excessive production at the mucosal level can be the cause of tissue damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723684     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2004.02158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  28 in total

1.  Semi-industrial Scale Production of a New Yeast with Probiotic Traits, Cryptococcus sp. YMHS, Isolated from the Red Sea.

Authors:  Ashraf F El-Baz; Hesham A El-Enshasy; Yousseria M Shetaia; Hoda Mahrous; Nor Zalina Othman; Ahmed E Yousef
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Strain-Specific Features of Extracellular Polysaccharides and Their Impact on Lactobacillus plantarum-Host Interactions.

Authors:  I-Chiao Lee; Graziano Caggianiello; Iris I van Swam; Nico Taverne; Marjolein Meijerink; Peter A Bron; Giuseppe Spano; Michiel Kleerebezem
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  S-layer protein mediates the stimulatory effect of Lactobacillus helveticus MIMLh5 on innate immunity.

Authors:  Valentina Taverniti; Milda Stuknyte; Mario Minuzzo; Stefania Arioli; Ivano De Noni; Christian Scabiosi; Zuzet Martinez Cordova; Ilkka Junttila; Sanna Hämäläinen; Hannu Turpeinen; Diego Mora; Matti Karp; Marko Pesu; Simone Guglielmetti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties of an enzymatic protein hydrolysate from yellow field pea seeds.

Authors:  Fatou Ndiaye; Tri Vuong; Jairo Duarte; Rotimi E Aluko; Chantal Matar
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Optimization of conditions for probiotic curd formulation by Enterococcus faecium MTCC 5695 with probiotic properties using response surface methodology.

Authors:  Vrinda Ramakrishnan; Louella Concepta Goveas; Maya Prakash; Prakash M Halami; Bhaskar Narayan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Construction of a recombinant allergen-producing probiotic bacterial strain: Introduction of a new line for a live oral vaccine against Chenopodium album pollen allergy.

Authors:  Leila Roozbeh Nasiraie; Farideh Tabatabaie; Mojtaba Sankian; Fakhri Shahidi; Abdolreza Varasteh
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10

7.  Functional analysis of putative adhesion factors in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM.

Authors:  B Logan Buck; Eric Altermann; Tina Svingerud; Todd R Klaenhammer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Gelatinase is important for translocation of Enterococcus faecalis across polarized human enterocyte-like T84 cells.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Fang Teng; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Probiotic Characteristics of Lactobacillus curvatus DN317, a Strain Isolated from Chicken Ceca.

Authors:  Mohamed Zommiti; Nathalie Connil; Jeannette Ben Hamida; Mounir Ferchichi
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Expression of antimicrobial peptides in cecal tonsils of chickens treated with probiotics and infected with Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Akbari; Hamid Reza Haghighi; James R Chambers; Jennifer Brisbin; Leah R Read; Shayan Sharif
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.