BACKGROUND: A 26-item Resident Choice Scale was designed to assess service practices for promoting resident choice. METHOD: The staff working with 560 UK/Irish adults with intellectual disability were interviewed. Specific examples of practices promoting resident choice were requested and independently rated by the interviewer. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of Resident Choice items was found to be acceptable (subsample n = 50). The psychometric properties of the Resident Choice Scale total score and scores on eight subscales were also acceptable. Consistently strong associations were found between greater resident choice and greater resident ability and, to a lesser extent, fewer resident challenging behaviours. Few associations were found between resident choice and autism or mental health problems. Even when controlling for resident ability and challenging behaviour, consistent associations were found between greater resident choice and the concurrent variables of greater community presence, fewer institutional practices, and greater user self-reported satisfaction (subsample n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, this pattern of results indicates that the Resident Choice Scale shows promise as a measure of the environmental opportunities available for adults with intellectual disability to exercise self-determination. Areas for future research testing the reliability and validity of the Resident Choice Scale are outlined.
BACKGROUND: A 26-item Resident Choice Scale was designed to assess service practices for promoting resident choice. METHOD: The staff working with 560 UK/Irish adults with intellectual disability were interviewed. Specific examples of practices promoting resident choice were requested and independently rated by the interviewer. RESULTS: The interrater reliability of Resident Choice items was found to be acceptable (subsample n = 50). The psychometric properties of the Resident Choice Scale total score and scores on eight subscales were also acceptable. Consistently strong associations were found between greater resident choice and greater resident ability and, to a lesser extent, fewer resident challenging behaviours. Few associations were found between resident choice and autism or mental health problems. Even when controlling for resident ability and challenging behaviour, consistent associations were found between greater resident choice and the concurrent variables of greater community presence, fewer institutional practices, and greater user self-reported satisfaction (subsample n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, this pattern of results indicates that the Resident Choice Scale shows promise as a measure of the environmental opportunities available for adults with intellectual disability to exercise self-determination. Areas for future research testing the reliability and validity of the Resident Choice Scale are outlined.
Authors: Graça Cardoso; Ana Papoila; Gina Tomé; Helen Killaspy; Michael King; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Helen Killaspy; Sarah White; Christine Wright; Tatiana L Taylor; Penny Turton; Thomas Kallert; Mirjam Schuster; Jorge A Cervilla; Paulette Brangier; Jiri Raboch; Lucie Kalisova; Georgi Onchev; Spiridon Alexiev; Roberto Mezzina; Pina Ridente; Durk Wiersma; Ellen Visser; Andrzej Kiejna; Patryk Piotrowski; Dimitris Ploumpidis; Fragiskos Gonidakis; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida; Graça Cardoso; Michael King Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Graça Cardoso; Ana Papoila; Gina Tomé; Helen Killaspy; Michael King; José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-02-20 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Helen Killaspy; Michael King; Christine Wright; Sarah White; Paul McCrone; Thomas Kallert; Jorge Cervilla; Jiri Raboch; Georgi Onchev; Roberto Mezzina; Durk Wiersma; Andrzej Kiejna; Dimitris Ploumpidis; Jose Miguel Caldas de Almeida Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 3.630