Literature DB >> 14723590

Whose health service is it anyway? Community values in healthcare.

Gavin H Mooney1, Scott H Blackwell.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in involving the public in decisions about healthcare provision. Citizens' juries, whose members were randomly selected from the electoral roll (rather than derived from consumer interest groups), have been trialled in Western Australia. When asked to take a community focus, presented with balanced evidence and given time to discuss and deliberate, the juries were able to identify and debate issues of broad principle, such as equity. Such issues seem to be best handled by referring to community values. Any public consultation process should provide sufficient information, opportunity for reflection and deliberation, and recognition of the scarcity of resources.

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14723590     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05804.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  15 in total

1.  A communitarian approach to public health.

Authors:  John E Ataguba; Gavin Mooney
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Setting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation.

Authors:  Edwine W Barasa; Sassy Molyneux; Mike English; Susan Cleary
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-09-16

3.  Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.

Authors:  Gisselle Gallego; Susan J Taylor; Paul McNeill; Jo-anne E Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Paul Burton; Elizabeth Kendall; Julie Ratcliffe; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-06-16

5.  Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach.

Authors:  Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Jackie M Street; Wendy A Rogers; Rodney Givney; John R Moss; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Community Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs--the PAraDOx Study.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Stephen Jan; John Rose; Steven Chadban; Richard D M Allen; Michelle Irving; Allison Tong; Germaine Wong; Jonathan C Craig; Alan Cass
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Implementing a One Health approach to emerging infectious disease: reflections on the socio-political, ethical and legal dimensions.

Authors:  Chris Degeling; Jane Johnson; Ian Kerridge; Andrew Wilson; Michael Ward; Cameron Stewart; Gwendolyn Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The ASTUTE Health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment.

Authors:  Amber M Watt; Janet E Hiller; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; John R Moss; Heather Buchan; Janet Wale; Dagmara E Riitano; Katherine Hodgetts; Jackie M Street; Adam G Elshaug
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development.

Authors:  Judy Gregory; Janette Hartz-Karp; Rebecca Watson
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2008-07-16

10.  Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.

Authors:  Nicole Moretto; Elizabeth Kendall; Jennifer Whitty; Joshua Byrnes; Andrew P Hills; Louisa Gordon; Erika Turkstra; Paul Scuffham; Tracy Comans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.