Literature DB >> 14722480

The sensitivity of substance abuse treatment intensity to co-payment levels.

Anthony T Lo Sasso1, John S Lyons.   

Abstract

This study exploits variation in co-payment levels among different contractual arrangements within a regional managed behavioral health care organization to estimate the relationship between co-payment levels for substance use treatment services and the intensity of substance use treatment. The substance use treatment benefits involved a range of co-payment levels across nearly 400 employers during the years 1993 through 1998. Multiple regression techniques were used to estimate the effect of co-payment levels on treatment intensity. The results indicate that co-payment levels had a significant negative effect on outpatient and inpatient substance use treatment. For outpatient treatment the effect on intensity implied a co-payment elasticity of -0.18, implying that moving from a $10 co-payment to a $20 co-payment would result in, for example, a reduction from 5 to 4 outpatient visits per episode. However, the effect was larger for persons with combined alcohol and drug use disorders, as they exhibited a co-payment elasticity of -0.27. For inpatient days, the co-payment elasticity was considerably smaller at -0.017. Given the benefits of maintaining persons with substance use disorders in treatment, employers may have an incentive to take steps to minimize the barriers to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14722480     DOI: 10.1007/bf02287338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  33 in total

1.  Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity.

Authors:  C H Lemak; J A Alexander
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption?

Authors:  R L Pacula
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The demand for alcohol: the differential response to price.

Authors:  W G Manning; L Blumberg; L H Moulton
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Stake theory as an explanatory device in Navajo alcoholism treatment response.

Authors:  F N Ferguson
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  1976

5.  Managed care and technical efficiency in outpatient substance abuse treatment units.

Authors:  J A Alexander; J R Wheeler; T A Nahra; C H Lemak
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  Mediators of drug treatment outcomes.

Authors:  D C Bell; A J Richard; L C Feltz
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Alcoholism treatment and total health care utilization and costs. A four-year longitudinal analysis of federal employees.

Authors:  H D Holder; J O Blose
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparative cocaine abuse treatment strategies: enhancing client retention and treatment exposure.

Authors:  J A Hoffman; B D Caudill; J J Koman; J W Luckey; P M Flynn; R L Hubbard
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  1994

9.  Dialogue. Industry consolidation: what's at stake for consumers and purchasers?

Authors:  W Greenberg; J Allen; J J Wider; C G Ray
Journal:  Behav Healthc Tomorrow       Date:  1998-08

10.  Cost implications of initial antidepressant selection in primary care.

Authors:  G E Simon; P Fishman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of public sector substance abuse treatment: comparison of a managed care approach to a traditional public sector system.

Authors:  Martha C Beattie; Teh-Wei Hu; Rui Li; Jason C Bond
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Effect of insurance parity on substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Vanessa Azzone; Richard G Frank; Sharon-Lise T Normand; M Audrey Burnam
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Benefit limits for behavioral health care in private health plans.

Authors:  Dominic Hodgkin; Constance M Horgan; Deborah W Garnick; Elizabeth L Merrick
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2008-11-27

4.  Healthcare utilization of individuals with substance use disorders following Affordable Care Act implementation in a California healthcare system.

Authors:  Derek D Satre; Vanessa A Palzes; Kelly C Young-Wolff; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Constance Weisner; Joseph Guydish; Cynthia I Campbell
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-08-04

5.  High-Deductible Health Plans: Implications for Substance Use Treatment.

Authors:  Sujaya Parthasarathy; Cynthia I Campbell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Characteristics of patients with substance use disorder before and after the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Cynthia I Campbell; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Andrea Altschuler; Kelly C Young-Wolff; Derek D Satre
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 7.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of employer-led interventions for drug misuse.

Authors:  Maxwell O Akanbi; Cassandra B Iroz; Linda C O'Dwyer; Adovich S Rivera; Megan Colleen McHugh
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.