BACKGROUND: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common condition in the elderly. A previous study demonstrated that it is associated with an increase in bone resorption. This effect was ameliorated by steroids, implying that inflammation is the cause of increased bone resorption and that this can be reduced by steroids. This is in keeping with accumulating evidence that systemic inflammation is associated with bone resorption and bone loss. We studied bone formation and resorption markers in 53 patients with PMR prior to any therapeutic intervention. METHODS: Bone resorption was measured by estimating urinary free pyridinoline (fPYD) and deoxypyridinoline (fDPD). Bone formation was estimated by measuring serum concentrations of procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP). Disease activity was assessed using inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein). Patients had a baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer scan to assess bone mineral density. RESULTS: Bone resorption markers were significantly increased and bone formation markers significantly decreased in PMR patients prior to treatment, compared with a control population matched for gender and age. CONCLUSIONS: This implies that bone turnover is uncoupled in PMR. This may lead to a decrease in skeletal mass in the long term due to the disease process alone. However, no significant loss of bone mineral density was detected. It is possible that, due to the acute onset of PMR, increased bone resorption is not present long enough to result in a detectable decrease in bone mineral density. The effects of steroid treatment on bone metabolism and the subsequent long-term outcome need to be investigated.
BACKGROUND:Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common condition in the elderly. A previous study demonstrated that it is associated with an increase in bone resorption. This effect was ameliorated by steroids, implying that inflammation is the cause of increased bone resorption and that this can be reduced by steroids. This is in keeping with accumulating evidence that systemic inflammation is associated with bone resorption and bone loss. We studied bone formation and resorption markers in 53 patients with PMR prior to any therapeutic intervention. METHODS: Bone resorption was measured by estimating urinary free pyridinoline (fPYD) and deoxypyridinoline (fDPD). Bone formation was estimated by measuring serum concentrations of procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP). Disease activity was assessed using inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein). Patients had a baseline dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer scan to assess bone mineral density. RESULTS: Bone resorption markers were significantly increased and bone formation markers significantly decreased in PMR patients prior to treatment, compared with a control population matched for gender and age. CONCLUSIONS: This implies that bone turnover is uncoupled in PMR. This may lead to a decrease in skeletal mass in the long term due to the disease process alone. However, no significant loss of bone mineral density was detected. It is possible that, due to the acute onset of PMR, increased bone resorption is not present long enough to result in a detectable decrease in bone mineral density. The effects of steroid treatment on bone metabolism and the subsequent long-term outcome need to be investigated.