Literature DB >> 14722334

Age-related changes in the functional visual field: further evidence for an inverse Age x Eccentricity effect.

Tanja R M Coeckelbergh1, Frans W Cornelissen, Wiebo H Brouwer, Aart C Kooijman.   

Abstract

We assessed the performance of younger and older individuals by using the Attended Field of View test, a visual search task in which eye movements were allowed. When adjusting for slower processing in the older age group by log transformation, we observed significant effects of age, eccentricity, and Age x Eccentricity. Contrary to most previous findings, the Age x Eccentricity effect was "inverted" in that the difference between the age groups decreased as a function of eccentricity. The finding that the eccentricity effect of younger individuals was larger than that of older individuals was caused by large age-related differences in sensitivity for centrally located targets, even though differences with regard to foveal resolution were controlled. The results further indicated that, given a brief amount of time, older persons could process a smaller field of view than younger persons. Consequently, older persons were forced to resort to serial scanning for a larger part of the display, whereas younger persons could process a larger area in parallel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14722334     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/59.1.p11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  9 in total

1.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Effect of age and pop out distracter on attended field of view.

Authors:  Raiju J Babu; Susan J Leat; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

3.  Can older adults' balance and mobility improve with visual attention training?

Authors:  Mohammed M Althomali; Lori Ann Vallis; Susan J Leat
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Enhancing Spatial Attention and Working Memory in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Camarin E Rolle; Joaquin A Anguera; Sasha N Skinner; Bradley Voytek; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Age-related decline of peripheral visual processing: the role of eye movements.

Authors:  Rainer Beurskens; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual vigilance in drivers with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Jon Tippin; JonDavid Sparks; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Effects of age and eccentricity on visual target detection.

Authors:  Nicole Gruber; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann; Rahel Bieri; Andrea Aeschimann; Giuseppe A Zito; Prabitha Urwyler; Thomas Nyffeler; Tobias Nef
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 9.  Technical Challenges for Smooth Interaction With Seniors With Dementia: Lessons From Humanitude™.

Authors:  Hidenobu Sumioka; Masahiro Shiomi; Miwako Honda; Atsushi Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-06-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.