BACKGROUND: It may be clinically useful to predict the depth of the epidural space. METHODS: To investigate the accuracy of preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) in prediction of the distance for low-thoracic epidural insertion, a single group observational study was conducted in 30 male patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery requiring epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Using the paramedian approach, low-thoracic epidural insertion at T10-11 interspace was performed with a standardized procedure to obtain an actual insertion length (AIL). According to the principles of trigonometry, an estimated insertion length (EIL) was calculated as 1.26 times the distance from skin to epidural space measured from the preoperative abdominal CT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) EIL and AIL were 5.5 (0.7) and 5.1 (0.6) cm, respectively, with a significant correlation (r=0.899, P<0.01). The EIL tended to have a higher value than the AIL (0.4 (0.3) cm). There were significant correlations of both EIL and AIL with weight (P<0.01), BMI (P<0.01), and body fat percentage (P<0.01), but not with height (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the preoperative abdominal CT is helpful in prediction of the distance for low-thoracic epidural insertion using the paramedian approach.
BACKGROUND: It may be clinically useful to predict the depth of the epidural space. METHODS: To investigate the accuracy of preoperative abdominal computed tomography (CT) in prediction of the distance for low-thoracic epidural insertion, a single group observational study was conducted in 30 male patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery requiring epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Using the paramedian approach, low-thoracic epidural insertion at T10-11 interspace was performed with a standardized procedure to obtain an actual insertion length (AIL). According to the principles of trigonometry, an estimated insertion length (EIL) was calculated as 1.26 times the distance from skin to epidural space measured from the preoperative abdominal CT. RESULTS: The mean (SD) EIL and AIL were 5.5 (0.7) and 5.1 (0.6) cm, respectively, with a significant correlation (r=0.899, P<0.01). The EIL tended to have a higher value than the AIL (0.4 (0.3) cm). There were significant correlations of both EIL and AIL with weight (P<0.01), BMI (P<0.01), and body fat percentage (P<0.01), but not with height (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the preoperative abdominal CT is helpful in prediction of the distance for low-thoracic epidural insertion using the paramedian approach.
Authors: Alyssa Kosturakis; Jose Soliz; Jackson Su; Juan P Cata; Lei Feng; Nusrat Harun; Ashley Amsbaugh; Rodolfo Gebhardt Journal: Pain Res Treat Date: 2015-04-16