Literature DB >> 14719740

Anchorage loss--a multifactorial response.

Silvia Geron1, Nir Shpack, Samouil Kandos, Moshe Davidovitch, Alexander D Vardimon.   

Abstract

Anchorage loss (AL) is a potential side effect of orthodontic mechanotherapy. In the present study, it is defined as the amount of mesial movement of the upper first permanent molar during premolar extraction space closure. In addition, AL is described as a multifactorial response in relation to the extraction site, appliance type, age, crowding, and overjet. For this study, 87 university clinic and private practice subjects, who were defined as maximum anchorage cases and had undergone bilateral maxillary premolar extractions, were divided into four groups according to extraction site (first vs second premolars), mechanics (lingual vs labial edgewise appliances), and age (adolescents vs adults). Overjet and crowding were examined from the overall sample. Data were collected from serial lateral cephalograms and dental casts. The results showed that as the severity of dental crowding increased, AL significantly decreased (r = -0.66, P = .001). Labial edgewise appliances demonstrated a significantly greater AL than did lingual edgewise appliances (1.15 +/- 2.06 mm, P < .05). A greater, though not statistically significant, AL was found in adults than in adolescents (0.73 +/- 1.43 mm). There was a slight nonsignificant increase in AL between maxillary second compared with first premolar extractions (0.51 +/- 1.33 mm). Overjet was weakly correlated to AL. These results suggest that AL is a multifactorial response and that the five examined factors can be divided into primary (crowding, mechanics) and secondary factors (age, extraction site, overjet), in declining order of importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14719740     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0730:ALMR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  14 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Pankaj Juneja; G Shivaprakash; S S Chopra; P B Kambalyal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-04-03

2.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems?

Authors:  Yassir A Yassir; Grant T McIntyre; Ahmed M El-Angbawi; David R Bearn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Comparison of achieved and predicted tooth movement of maxillary first molars and central incisors: First premolar extraction treatment with Invisalign.

Authors:  Fan-Fan Dai; Tian-Min Xu; Guang Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Comparison of anchorage capacity between implant and headgear during anterior segment retraction.

Authors:  F Li; H K Hu; J W Chen; Z P Liu; G F Li; S S He; S J Zou; Q S Ye
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction : A systematic review.

Authors:  Kumeran Mohan; Saritha Sivarajan; May Nak Lau; Siti Adibah Othman; Mona M Salah Fayed
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  Comparative photoelastic study of dental and skeletal anchorages in the canine retraction.

Authors:  Cristiane Aparecida de Assis Claro; Rosana Villela Chagas; Ana Christina Elias Claro Neves; Laís Regiane da Silva-Concílio
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Maxillary incisors changes during space closure with conventional and skeletal anchorage methods: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yasas Shri Nalaka Jayaratne; Flavio Uribe; Nandakumar Janakiraman
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-12-02

9.  Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.

Authors:  Zohreh Hedayati; Mehrdad Shomali
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Analysis of the Morphological Characteristics of the Palatal Rugae for Three-Dimensional Superimposition of Digital Models in Korean Subjects.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Choi; Kyongmin Koh; Kee-Joon Lee; Chung-Ju Hwang; Jung-Yul Cha
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.