Literature DB >> 14719739

Management of alveolar clefts using dento-osseous transport distraction osteogenesis.

Dogan Dolanmaz1, Ali Ihya Karaman, Ercan Durmus, Siddik Malkoc.   

Abstract

This article evaluates the usage of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the treatment of cleft alveoli. The procedure was carried out on eight alveolar clefts of five patients between the ages of 17 and 25 years. Three patients had bilateral alveolar clefts (BAC) and two patients had unilateral alveolar clefts (UAC). DO was carried out bilateral to the palatal segments for the BAC patients and unilateral to the lesser segment for the UAC patients. A custom-made tooth-borne distractor was used. The average amount of distraction was eight mm (range, 5-11.5 mm). The average amount of distal movement of the anchorage teeth was 0.8 mm (range, 0-2 mm). The average amount of inclination changes of the transport segments and anchorage teeth was 7.6 degrees (range, 2-17.5 degrees) and 3.3 degrees (range, 0-9 degrees), respectively. Two important problems were observed attributable to the method. First, the transport segment was docked in a more superior position at the end of distraction process. This undesirable movement also changed the inclination of the teeth in the transport segment and increased tooth tipping. Removing the device in the second week of the consolidation period and retracting the segment to its ideal position orthodontically solved these problems. Second, the bony defect on the nasal side of the alveolar cleft could not be completely closed. This method for repairing small or large alveolar clefts is a simple, cost-effective, and useful treatment option. However, repairing the alveolar cleft without grafts seems to be impossible when using a tooth-borne device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14719739     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0723:MOACUD>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  3 in total

1.  Closure of large alveolar defect by maxillary alveolar distraction using a vector-controlled distractor appliance in cleft patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Sujata Mohanty; Priyank Rai; Neha Bhutiani
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-19

2.  Orthodontically guided bone transport in the treatment of alveolar cleft: A case report.

Authors:  Estefanía Alonso-Rodríguez; Elena Gómez; Marta Otero; Rosario Berraquero; Begona Wucherpfennig; Juan Hernández-Godoy; Jorge Guiñales; Germán Vincent; Miguel Burgueño
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-02-01

3.  Protocol and Evaluation of 3D-Planned Microsurgical and Dental Implant Reconstruction of Maxillary Cleft Critical Size Defects in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Krzysztof Dowgierd; Rafał Pokrowiecki; Maciej Borowiec; Zuzanna Sokolowska; Martyna Dowgierd; Jan Wos; Marcin Kozakiewicz; Łukasz Krakowczyk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.