Literature DB >> 14719733

A comparative analysis of maxillary tooth movement produced by cervical headgear and pend-x appliance.

Tülin Uğur Taner1, Filiz Yukay, Muge Pehlivanoglu, Banu Cakirer.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cervical headgear and pend-x on the maxillary first molar, second molar, first premolar, and upper incisors. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained at the start of treatment (T1) and after molar distalization was completed (T2) for 13 patients in a pend-x group and 13 patients in a cervical headgear group. The changes of the maxillary teeth were measured on maxillary superimpositions. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the mean differences between the two groups. The mean amount of distalization for the headgear group was 3.15 +/- 1.94 mm and that for the pend-x group was 3.81 +/- 2.25 mm. The second molar teeth were also distalized to a mean amount of 2.27 +/- 1.33 mm in the headgear group and 2.04 +/- 2.15 mm in the pend-x group. The mean treatment time for distalization was 11.38 +/- 3.18 months for the headgear group and 7.31 +/- 4.09 months for the pend-x group. During distalization, the maxillary molars tipped distally in both groups, but intergroup differences were not significant. The anterior inclinations of the first premolar and upper incisor increased significantly in the pend-x group (P < .01). Maxillary molars showed no vertical movement in the pend-x group but extruded in the headgear group (P < .01). The anchorage loss of the pend-x appliance as well as the necessary patient compliance and greater treatment time with the cervical headgear should be taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14719733     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0686:ACAOMT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  M M El-Dawlatly; A M Abou-El-Ezz; F A El-Sharaby; Y A Mostafa
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  Orthodontic treatment for crowded teeth in children.

Authors:  Sarah Turner; Jayne E Harrison; Fyeza Nj Sharif; Darren Owens; Declan T Millett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-31

3.  Early headgear effect on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars.

Authors:  Yossi Abed; Ilana Brin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Treatment effects of quad-helix on the eruption pattern of maxillary second molars.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kobayashi; Isao Shundo; Toshiya Endo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

7.  Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Mauro Cozzani; Mattia Fontana
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.