Literature DB >> 14719732

Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.

Christopher J Lux1, Christian Conradt, Donald Burden, Gerda Komposch.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the transverse morphology and development of the dental arches and skeletal mandibular-maxillary bases in untreated Class II malocclusions. Using the records of the Belfast Growth Study, a Class II division 1 group (II/1) and a Class II division 2 group (II/2) were compared with a Class I group and a control group with good occlusion. On posteroanterior cephalograms, maxillary skeletal base width and bigonial and biantegonial widths were determined at two-year intervals between seven and 15 years. Maxillary and mandibular intermolar widths were measured on the associated study casts. As a result, maxillary skeletal base widths were smallest in the Class II/1 subjects. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups for the skeletal mandibular widths. With respect to the development of the dental arches, maxillary intermolar widths were smaller in the Class II/1 group than in the Class I and the good-occlusion groups. These group differences were present for the total period of observation, ie, seven to 15 years, and statistically significant at most ages. When the relative difference between the maxillary and the mandibular intermolar widths was examined, the Class II/1 cases were found to have the largest average difference (about -2.5 mm for boys and -1.5 mm for girls), indicating a relatively narrow maxillary arch. Less pronounced molar differences were found in the Class II/2 group. In the Class II/1 subjects the deviations in molar differences observed at 15 years of age were established already at 7 years of age and maintained during 7 and 15 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14719732     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0674:DAWAMB>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Erum Behroz Khan; Sunia Soomar; Mairah Shah; Samar Fatima; Sohail Khan; Zuhair Ahmed; Sarvaich Kumar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Evaluation of Horizontal Distance between WALA-FA Point in Angle's Class I, Class II, and Class III Malocclusion.

Authors:  R Mahalakshmi; M M Varadharaja; Reshmi Leila Ninan; V Vignesh Kumar; B Kanagasabapathy; M D Saravana Balaji
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

3.  Differential Benefit of Two Different Tooth-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances in Female Subjects.

Authors:  Lale Taner; Gamze Metin-Gürsoy; Naciye Derin Sarısu-Demircioğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-11

4.  Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland.

Authors:  Jodi Leversha; Glen McKeough; Adriana Myrteza; Hannah Skjellrup-Wakefiled; Jordan Welsh; Amar Sholapurkar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-02-01

5.  Dental sex dimorphism: Using odontometrics and digital jaw radiography.

Authors:  B N V S Satish; Chanchal Moolrajani; Maharudrappa Basnaker; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr

6.  Posterior dental compensation and occlusal function in adults with different sagittal skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Soonshin Hwang; Yoon Jeong Choi; Sooin Jung; Sujin Kim; Chooryung J Chung; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  A Novel Mathematical Method to Diagnose the Transverse Growth Deficit of the Nasomaxillary Complex.

Authors:  Clara Guinot-Barona; Inmaculada Soler Segarra; Santiago Arias de Luxán; Raquel Laparra Hernández; Laura Marqués Martínez; Esther García Miralles
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

8.  Evaluation of arch width among Class I normal occlusion, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III malocclusion in Indian population.

Authors:  Dolly Patel; Falguni Mehta; Nimesh Patel; Nishit Mehta; Ipist Trivedi; Apexa Mehta
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015-09

9.  Archform comparisons between skeletal class II and III malocclusions.

Authors:  Wei Zou; JiaQi Wu; JiuHui Jiang; TianMin Xu; CuiYing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Huang; Xinnong Hu; Yijiao Zhao; Yong Wang; Yan Gu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.