Literature DB >> 14719727

The investigation of occlusal contacts during the retention period.

Müfide Dinçer1, Orhan Meral, Nazli Tümer.   

Abstract

Removable retention appliances were applied to 20 treated orthodontic patients, and their occlusal contact points were determined from occlusal registrations taken at the beginning and the end of retention. Furthermore, to determine the results at the end of retention, the occlusion of 20 treated patients was compared with a control group of another 20 subjects who had an ideal occlusion. During the retention phase the number of contacts in centric occlusion increased significantly. No significant difference was observed with regard to the location of contacts. Whereas the number of ideally located contacts was similar to that in the control group, differences were observed in actual and canine contacts between the groups. At the end of retention, the balancing side contacts in lateral movements and the posterior contacts in protrusive movements were generally determined as near contacts and showed a similarity to the control group. In order to maintain the occlusal stability that is needed for the success of orthodontic treatments, ideal occlusal contacts and localization of contacts in centric and eccentric occlusion should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14719727     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0640:TIOOCD>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  4 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Over-the-counter (OTC) bruxism splints available on the Internet.

Authors:  R W Wassell; L Verhees; K Lawrence; S Davies; F Lobbezoo
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bauer; Rolf Behrents; Donald R Oliver; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment outcome differences between pass and fail scores and correlation between cephalometric changes and cast-radiograph evaluation of the American Board of Orthodontics.

Authors:  Siew Peng Neoh; Chulaluk Komoltri; Nita Viwattanatipa
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-11-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.