Literature DB >> 14718876

Clinical trial comparing plasma arc and conventional halogen curing lights for orthodontic bonding.

Bruno Manzo1, Giuseppe Liistro, Hugo De Clerck.   

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the reliability and time saved with a plasma arc curing unit (Apollo 95E, Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Woodland Hills, Calif) compared with a conventional curing unit (Ortholux XL 3000, 3M Unitek, St Paul, Minn) for direct bracket bonding with resin adhesive. Forty-five patients were involved in the study, and 608 brackets were bonded in a contralateral quadrant pattern. The patients were followed for a mean (+/- standard deviation) period of 11 +/- 3.2 months. Survival analysis was carried out to compare the failure rate for the 2 techniques. The time required for bonding with each technique was also recorded. The mean survival time was 399 days, and there were no significant differences in survival time between the 2 bonding methods. Twelve bonding failures were reported with each technique. The curing time per bracket was significantly reduced with the plasma curing light compared with a conventional curing unit (65 +/- 19 vs 82 +/- 31 seconds). The plasma arc curing light can save chair-time without affecting the bonding failure rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14718876     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  2 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Cured with Different Light Sources under Thermocycling.

Authors:  Oral Sokucu; Seyda Herguner Siso; Firat Ozturk; Ruhi Nalcaci
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-07

2.  How and why of orthodontic bond failures: An in vivo study.

Authors:  R K Vijayakumar; Raju Jagadeep; Fayyaz Ahamed; Aprose Kanna; K Suresh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.