Literature DB >> 14718320

Additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin to decrease risks of cardiovascular disease: randomized and observational comparisons of secondary prevention trials and their meta-analyses.

Charles H Hennekens1, Frank M Sacks, Andrew Tonkin, J Wouter Jukema, Robert P Byington, Bertram Pitt, Donald A Berry, Scott M Berry, Neville F Ford, Andrew J Walker, Kannan Natarajan, Chen Sheng-Lin, Frederick T Fiedorek, Rene Belder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In randomized trials of secondary prevention, pravastatin sodium and aspirin reduce risks of cardiovascular disease. Pravastatin has a predominantly delayed antiatherogenic effect, and aspirin has an immediate antiplatelet effect, raising the possibility of additive clinical benefits.
METHODS: In 5 randomized trials of secondary prevention with pravastatin (40 mg/d), comprising 73 900 patient-years of observation, aspirin use was also prescribed in varying frequencies, and data were available on a large number of confounding variables. We tested whether pravastatin and aspirin have additive benefits in the 2 large trials (Long-term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease trial and the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events trial) that were designed to test clinical benefits. We also performed meta-analyses of these 2 trials and 3 smaller angiographic trials that collected clinical end points. In all analyses, multivariate models were used to adjust for a large number of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
RESULTS: Individual trials and all meta-analyses demonstrated similar additive benefits of pravastatin and aspirin on cardiovascular disease. In meta-analysis, the relative risk reductions for fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction were 31% for pravastatin plus aspirin vs aspirin alone and 26% for pravastatin plus aspirin vs pravastatin alone. For ischemic stroke, the corresponding relative risk reductions were 29% and 31%. For the composite end point of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or ischemic stroke, the relative risk reductions were 24% and 13%. All relative risk reductions were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: More widespread and appropriate combined use of statins and aspirin in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease will avoid large numbers of premature deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14718320     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cardiology.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Knut Schroeder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Rationale for combination therapy with statin drugs in the treatment of dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ansell
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  The polypill and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Tom Fahey; Peter Brindle; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-05-07

4.  Organizing services for cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Robert C Block; Thomas A Pearson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

5.  Prevention: Aspirin in primary prevention needs individual judgements.

Authors:  Charles H Hennekens; David L DeMets
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Statins and the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Michael Clearfield
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Risk assessment and aspirin use in Asian and Western populations.

Authors:  Runlin Gao; Xiaoying Li
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-10-21

8.  An assessment of the joint associations of aspirin and statin use with C-reactive protein concentration.

Authors:  Matt Fisher; Mary Cushman; Volker Knappertz; George Howard
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 9.  Aspirin in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease: current perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Charles H Hennekens
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  How many cardiovascular events can be prevented with optimal management of high-risk Canadians?

Authors:  Daniel T Grima; Lawrence A Leiter; Shaun G Goodman; Cheryl L Attard; Chi-Ming Chow; Anatoly Langer
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.