Literature DB >> 14717902

Effective size of two feral domestic cat populations (Felis catus L): effect of the mating system.

R Kaeuffer1, D Pontier, S Devillard, N Perrin.   

Abstract

A variety of behavioural traits have substantial effects on the gene dynamics and genetic structure of local populations. The mating system is a plastic trait that varies with environmental conditions in the domestic cat (Felis catus) allowing an intraspecific comparison of the impact of this feature on genetic characteristics of the population. To assess the potential effect of the heterogenity of males' contribution to the next generation on variance effective size, we applied the ecological approach of Nunney & Elam (1994) based upon a demographic and behavioural study, and the genetic 'temporal methods' of Waples (1989) and Berthier et al. (2002) using microsatellite markers. The two cat populations studied were nearly closed, similar in size and survival parameters, but differed in their mating system. Immigration appeared extremely restricted in both cases due to environmental and social constraints. As expected, the ratio of effective size to census number (Ne/N) was higher in the promiscuous cat population (harmonic mean = 42%) than in the polygynous one (33%), when Ne was calculated from the ecological method. Only the genetic results based on Waples' estimator were consistent with the ecological results, but failed to evidence an effect of the mating system. Results based on the estimation of Berthier et al. (2002) were extremely variable, with Ne sometimes exceeding census size. Such low reliability in the genetic results should retain attention for conservation purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14717902     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02046.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  4 in total

1.  Temporal estimates of effective population size in species with overlapping generations.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Masashi Yokota
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Comparison of carnivore, omnivore, and herbivore mammalian genomes with a new leopard assembly.

Authors:  Soonok Kim; Yun Sung Cho; Hak-Min Kim; Oksung Chung; Hyunho Kim; Sungwoong Jho; Hong Seomun; Jeongho Kim; Woo Young Bang; Changmu Kim; Junghwa An; Chang Hwan Bae; Youngjune Bhak; Sungwon Jeon; Hyejun Yoon; Yumi Kim; JeHoon Jun; HyeJin Lee; Suan Cho; Olga Uphyrkina; Aleksey Kostyria; John Goodrich; Dale Miquelle; Melody Roelke; John Lewis; Andrey Yurchenko; Anton Bankevich; Juok Cho; Semin Lee; Jeremy S Edwards; Jessica A Weber; Jo Cook; Sangsoo Kim; Hang Lee; Andrea Manica; Ilbeum Lee; Stephen J O'Brien; Jong Bhak; Joo-Hong Yeo
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  Retrospective genomics highlights changes in genetic composition of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) and potential loss of a south-eastern Australia population.

Authors:  Alice Manuzzi; Belen Jiménez-Mena; Romina Henriques; Bonnie J Holmes; Julian Pepperell; Janette Edson; Mike B Bennett; Charlie Huveneers; Jennifer R Ovenden; Einar E Nielsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Can genetic estimators provide robust estimates of the effective number of breeders in small populations?

Authors:  Marion Hoehn; Bernd Gruber; Stephen D Sarre; Rebecca Lange; Klaus Henle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.