Literature DB >> 14717160

Estimation of primary and secondary particulate matter intake fractions for power plants in Georgia.

Jonathan I Levy1, Andrew M Wilson, John S Evans, John D Spengler.   

Abstract

Air pollution benefit-cost analyses depend on dispersion models to predict population exposures to pollutants, but it is difficult to determine the reasonableness of the model estimates. This is in part because validation with field measurements is not feasible for marginal concentration changes and because few models can capture the necessary spatial and temporal domains with adequate sophistication. In this study, we use the concept of an intake fraction (the fraction of a pollutant or its precursor emitted that is eventually inhaled) to provide insight about population exposures and model performance. We apply CALPUFF, a regional-scale dispersion model common in health benefits assessments, to seven power plants in northern Georgia, considering both direct emissions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and secondarily formed ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate particles over a domain within 500 km of Atlanta. We estimate emission-weighted average intake fractions of 6 x 10(-7) for primary PM2.5, 2 x 10(-7) for ammonium sulfate from SO2, and 6 x 10(-8) for ammonium nitrate from NOx, with no effect of SO2 on ammonium nitrate. To provide insight about model strengths and limitations, we compare our findings with those from a frequently applied source-receptor (S-R) matrix. Using S-R matrix over an identical domain, the corresponding intake fractions are 5 x 10(-7), 2 x 10(-7), 3 x 10(-8), and -2 x 10(-8), respectively, with the values approximately doubling if the domain is expanded to cover the continental United States. Evaluation of model assumptions and comparison of past intake fraction estimates using these two models illustrates the importance of assumptions about the relative concentrations of ammonia, sulfate, and nitrate, which significantly influences ammonium nitrate intake fractions. These findings provide a framework for improved understanding of the factors that influence population exposures to particulate matter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14717160     DOI: 10.1021/es034484l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion: a health risk assessment.

Authors:  Jonathan I Levy; Jonathan J Buonocore; Katherine von Stackelberg
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 2.  Ancillary human health benefits of improved air quality resulting from climate change mitigation.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Devra L Davis; Luis A Cifuentes; Alan J Krupnick; Richard D Morgenstern; George D Thurston
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Secondary Particulate Matter Originating from an Industrial Source and Its Impact on Population Health.

Authors:  Cristina Mangia; Marco Cervino; Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Between-airport heterogeneity in air toxics emissions associated with individual cancer risk thresholds and population risks.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 5.  Factors influencing the spatial extent of mobile source air pollution impacts: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Quantifying the efficiency and equity implications of power plant air pollution control strategies in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan I Levy; Andrew M Wilson; Leonard M Zwack
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  The public health benefits of insulation retrofits in existing housing in the United States.

Authors:  Jonathan I Levy; Yurika Nishioka; John D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  The Role of Science in Advising the Decision Making Process: A Pathway for Building Effective Climate Change Mitigation Policies in Mexico at the Local Level.

Authors:  Roberto Barraza; Gilberto Velazquez-Angulo; Edith Flores-Tavizón; Jaime Romero-González; José Ignacio Huertas-Cardozo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.