Mark Barber1, David J Stott. 1. Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK. m.barber@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment and dementia are very common after stroke. Telephone screening has potential advantages for clinical follow-up and population-based research in this group. We wished to test the validity of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) for cognitive testing in post-stroke subjects. METHODS: Cognitive function in stroke outpatients was assessed using the R-CAMCOG (a modification of the cognitive part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly, for use in stroke subjects) along with the TICS and a modified version, the TICSm. The tests were administered in random order. A cut-off point of 33 on the R-CAMCOG was used to define post-stroke dementia. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 72 years were assessed. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the R-CAMCOG and the TICS and TICSm were 0.833 and 0.855 (both p <0.001) respectively. Twenty-four (38%) patients met R-CAMCOG criteria for post-stroke dementia. The area under the ROC curve for both the TICS and TICSm was 0.94. Using a cut-off of 28 or less on the TICS produced a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 85% for the diagnosis of post-stroke dementia. For the TICSm a cut-off of 20 or lower produced a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The TICS and TICSm telephone questionnaires are practicable and valid methods of assessing cognitive function in community outpatients following stroke. Scores of < or =28 and < or =20 respectively carry good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of post-stroke dementia. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive impairment and dementia are very common after stroke. Telephone screening has potential advantages for clinical follow-up and population-based research in this group. We wished to test the validity of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) for cognitive testing in post-stroke subjects. METHODS: Cognitive function in stroke outpatients was assessed using the R-CAMCOG (a modification of the cognitive part of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly, for use in stroke subjects) along with the TICS and a modified version, the TICSm. The tests were administered in random order. A cut-off point of 33 on the R-CAMCOG was used to define post-stroke dementia. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with a median age of 72 years were assessed. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the R-CAMCOG and the TICS and TICSm were 0.833 and 0.855 (both p <0.001) respectively. Twenty-four (38%) patients met R-CAMCOG criteria for post-stroke dementia. The area under the ROC curve for both the TICS and TICSm was 0.94. Using a cut-off of 28 or less on the TICS produced a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 85% for the diagnosis of post-stroke dementia. For the TICSm a cut-off of 20 or lower produced a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The TICS and TICSm telephone questionnaires are practicable and valid methods of assessing cognitive function in community outpatients following stroke. Scores of < or =28 and < or =20 respectively carry good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of post-stroke dementia. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Mark A Espeland; Stephen R Rapp; Jeff A Katula; Lee Ann Andrews; Deborah Felton; Sarah A Gaussoin; Dale Dagenbach; Claudine Legault; Janine M Jennings; Kaycee M Sink Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Sue E Leurgans; Tatiana M Foroud; Robert A Sweet; Neill Graff-Radford; Richard Mayeux; David A Bennett Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-07
Authors: Alessandro Biffi; Abbas Rattani; Christopher D Anderson; Alison M Ayres; Edip M Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan Journal: Brain Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Stephen R Rapp; Claudine Legault; Mark A Espeland; Susan M Resnick; Patricia E Hogan; Laura H Coker; Maggie Dailey; Sally A Shumaker Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alessandro Biffi; Destiny Bailey; Christopher D Anderson; Alison M Ayres; Edip M Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 18.302