Literature DB >> 14716451

Liver tumors: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

D Cosgrove1, M Blomley.   

Abstract

The development and clinical introduction of microbubble contrast agents has had a particular impact on the detection and differential diagnosis of liver tumors. The first approach widely employed made use of high-transmission power ultrasound, which destroyed the microbubbles in the process of imaging them. It is particularly successful for those agents that have a liver-specific post-vascular phase because, like liver-specific agents used in other imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine, malignancies do not retain the contrast, so they stand out with very high conspicuity. Used this way with color Doppler or variants of it, more subcentimeter lesions can be demonstrated with ultrasound than with computed tomography. However, the destructive nature of this approach meant that continuous real-time scanning was impossible. Two developments allowed this to be redressed: new classes of microbubbles with perfluoro gasses instead of air and the invention of multipulse scanning modes that are sensitive to the nonlinear (harmonic) responses of the microbubbles and suppresses tissue signals. This low-power approach is now used almost exclusively, and it has the advantage of displaying the arterial phase of blood supply to a mass and a later phase when the bubbles are trapped in the sinusoids so that the vascular volume of the tissue is depicted. Malignancies typically show a low signal intensity in this phase, regardless of whether they are hyper- or hypovascular in terms of their arterial supply. This allows them to be detected with high sensitivity and much more easily than the destructive modes allowed. In addition, the arterial supply that can be now depicted in real time has characteristics that allow most benign masses to be distinguished from each other and from malignancies, thus improving specificity. Microbubbles also can be used as tracers to provide functional information that can detect occult metastases and cirrhosis noninvasively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14716451     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-003-0126-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  15 in total

Review 1.  A State-of-the-Art Review on the Evolving Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Diseases Diagnosis.

Authors:  Wisam Sbeit; Anas Kadah; Mahmud Mahamid; Rinaldo Pellicano; Amir Mari; Tawfik Khoury
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 2.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in a transplanted kidney: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Alyssa Lampe; Vinay A Duddalwar; Hooman Djaladat; Manju Aron; Mittul Gulati
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-31

4.  Role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic metastases: A review.

Authors:  Lars Peter Skovgaard Larsen
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2010-01-27

5.  Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for qualitative imaging of atherosclerosis in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits: initial experimental study.

Authors:  Ayumi Nitta-Seko; Norihisa Nitta; Masashi Shiomi; Akinaga Sonoda; Shinichi Ota; Keiko Tsuchiya; Masashi Takahashi; Mineko Fujimiya; Murata Kiyoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Asmaa I Gomaa; Shahid A Khan; Edward L S Leen; Imam Waked; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Use of second generation contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Stanislas-H Morin; Adrian-Kp Lim; Jeremy-Fl Cobbold; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of 20 cases.

Authors:  Qiang Lu; Yan Luo; Chao-Xin Yuan; Yong Zeng; Hong Wu; Zheng Lei; Yao Zhong; Yu-Ting Fan; Hong-Hao Wang; Yang Luo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Application of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in the decision-making about hepatocellular carcinoma operation.

Authors:  Hong Wu; Qiang Lu; Yan Luo; Xian-Lu He; Yong Zeng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys: what is it capable of?

Authors:  Demosthenes D Cokkinos; Eleni G Antypa; Maria Skilakaki; Despoina Kriketou; Ekaterini Tavernaraki; Ploutarchos N Piperopoulos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.