OBJECTIVE: To draw attention to the implications of smoking in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and for the effectiveness and safety of hormone therapy. DESIGN Summary of own research and a MEDLINE search of English-language literature on the antiestrogenic effect of smoking in pre- and postmenopausal women published during the past two decades. RESULTS: Numerous observations suggest that part of the detrimental effect of smoking on bone metabolism is mediated by an adverse influence on sex-steroid metabolism, and in particular by an estrogen-lowering effect. Furthermore, in smokers, serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone during oral, but not parenteral, hormone therapy (HT) reach only half the concentrations of nonsmokers. Thus, cigarette smoking may reduce the favorable effects of HT significantly and may even negate the protective effects. In such cases, the failure of preventive therapy is a failure of dosing rather than of HT per se. CONCLUSIONS: We urge colleagues to take the antiestrogenic effect of smoking into account when drawing conclusions from population-based trials, as well as when prescribing HT to their patients for the prevention of menopause-related health problems.
OBJECTIVE: To draw attention to the implications of smoking in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and for the effectiveness and safety of hormone therapy. DESIGN Summary of own research and a MEDLINE search of English-language literature on the antiestrogenic effect of smoking in pre- and postmenopausal women published during the past two decades. RESULTS: Numerous observations suggest that part of the detrimental effect of smoking on bone metabolism is mediated by an adverse influence on sex-steroid metabolism, and in particular by an estrogen-lowering effect. Furthermore, in smokers, serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone during oral, but not parenteral, hormone therapy (HT) reach only half the concentrations of nonsmokers. Thus, cigarette smoking may reduce the favorable effects of HT significantly and may even negate the protective effects. In such cases, the failure of preventive therapy is a failure of dosing rather than of HT per se. CONCLUSIONS: We urge colleagues to take the antiestrogenic effect of smoking into account when drawing conclusions from population-based trials, as well as when prescribing HT to their patients for the prevention of menopause-related health problems.
Authors: Sungshim Lani Park; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Manuela Marron; Antonio Agudo; Wolfgang Ahrens; Luigi Barzan; Vladimir Bencko; Simone Benhamou; Christine Bouchardy; Cristina Canova; Xavier Castellsague; David I Conway; Claire M Healy; Ivana Holcátová; Kristina Kjaerheim; Pagona Lagiou; Raymond J Lowry; Tatiana V Macfarlane; Gary J Macfarlane; Bernard E McCartan; Patricia A McKinney; Franco Merletti; Hermann Pohlabeln; Lorenzo Richiardi; Lorenzo Simonato; Linda Sneddon; Renato Talamini; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Ariana Znaor; Paul Brennan; Mia Hashibe Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Meira Epplein; Susan D Reed; Lynda F Voigt; Katherine M Newton; Victoria L Holt; Noel S Weiss Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Brian W Whitcomb; Sara D Bodach; Sunni L Mumford; Neil J Perkins; Maurizio Trevisan; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Aiyi Liu; Enrique F Schisterman Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: S K Park; S D Harlow; H Zheng; C Karvonen-Gutierrez; R C Thurston; K Ruppert; I Janssen; J F Randolph Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Song-Yi Park; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Christopher A Haiman; Elisa V Bandera; Traci N Bethea; Melissa A Troester; Emma Viscidi; Laurence N Kolonel; Andrew F Olshan; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Chi Le-Ha; Lawrence J Beilin; Sally Burrows; Wendy H Oddy; Beth Hands; Trevor A Mori Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Sarah E Daugherty; James V Lacey; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Yikyung Park; Robert N Hoover; Debra T Silverman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 7.396