Literature DB >> 14715954

Neural substrates mediating human delay and trace fear conditioning.

David C Knight1, Dominic T Cheng, Christine N Smith, Elliot A Stein, Fred J Helmstetter.   

Abstract

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies with human subjects have explored the neural substrates involved in forming associations in Pavlovian fear conditioning. Most of these studies used delay procedures, in which the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (UCS) coterminate. Less is known about brain regions that support trace conditioning, a procedure in which an interval of time (trace interval) elapses between CS termination and UCS onset. Previous work suggests significant overlap in the neural circuitry supporting delay and trace fear conditioning, although trace conditioning requires recruitment of additional brain regions. In the present event-related fMRI study, skin conductance and continuous measures of UCS expectancy were recorded concurrently with whole-brain blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) imaging during direct comparison of delay and trace discrimination learning. Significant activation was observed within the visual cortex for all CSs. Anterior cingulate and medial thalamic activity reflected associative learning common to both delay and trace procedures. Activations within the supplementary motor area (SMA), frontal operculum, middle frontal gyri, and inferior parietal lobule were specifically associated with trace interval processing. The hippocampus displayed BOLD signal increases early in training during all conditions; however, differences were observed in hippocampal response magnitude related to the accuracy of predicting UCS presentations. These results demonstrate overlapping patterns of activation within the anterior cingulate, medial thalamus, and visual cortex during delay and trace procedures, with additional recruitment of the hippocampus, SMA, frontal operculum, middle frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobule during trace conditioning. These data suggest that the hippocampus codes temporal information during trace conditioning, whereas brain regions supporting working memory processes maintain the CS-UCS representation during the trace interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14715954      PMCID: PMC6729570          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0433-03.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  97 in total

Review 1.  Molecular specificity of multiple hippocampal processes governing fear extinction.

Authors:  Jelena Radulovic; Natalie C Tronson
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.353

2.  The role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  J D Raybuck; T J Gould
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Trace and contextual fear conditioning require neural activity and NMDA receptor-dependent transmission in the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Marieke R Gilmartin; Fred J Helmstetter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Thalamocortical interactions underlying visual fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  Chrysa Lithari; Stephan Moratti; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Potentiation of the early visual response to learned danger signals in adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Liat Levita; Philippa Howsley; Jeff Jordan; Pat Johnston
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Prefrontal activity links nonoverlapping events in memory.

Authors:  Marieke R Gilmartin; Hiroyuki Miyawaki; Fred J Helmstetter; Kamran Diba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Experiential, autonomic, and neural responses during threat anticipation vary as a function of threat intensity and neuroticism.

Authors:  Emily M Drabant; Janice R Kuo; Wiveka Ramel; Jens Blechert; Michael D Edge; Jeff R Cooper; Philippe R Goldin; Ahmad R Hariri; James J Gross
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Macromolecular synthesis, distributed synaptic plasticity, and fear conditioning.

Authors:  Fred J Helmstetter; Ryan G Parsons; Georgette M Gafford
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Neural mechanisms of human temporal fear conditioning.

Authors:  Nathaniel G Harnett; Joshua R Shumen; Pooja A Wagle; Kimberly H Wood; Muriah D Wheelock; James H Baños; David C Knight
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.