Literature DB >> 14714839

Comparisons of chewing difficulty of consumed foods with mandibular conventional dentures and implant-supported overdentures in diabetic denture wearers.

Eleni D Roumanas1, Neal R Garrett, Michael O Hamada, Krishan K Kapur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the chewing difficulty of foods in diets of denture wearers with mandibular conventional and implant-supported overdentures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-week dietary logs were evaluated for 58 subjects with controlled diabetes at baseline with their original dentures and with new dentures 6 months after treatment completion. Subjects received new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures, 21 with mandibular conventional dentures and 37 with implant-supported overdentures. A 10-point chewing difficulty rating scale (10 for most difficult-to-chew foods) was used to rate food items in the dietary logs.
RESULTS: ANOVA showed no differences between the chewing difficulty mean scores for all foods consumed either at baseline or posttreatment for the two groups. However, the mean scores for the combined consumption frequency of difficult-to-chew foods (6 to 10) showed a significant decrease following treatment with both types of dentures. This decline did not differ significantly between the denture types. With original dentures, more than 91% of subjects consumed foods with chewing difficulty scores of 6 to 10 at least seven times per week. With study dentures, only 21% maintained this level of consumption, with the frequency decreasing to four to six times per week in 24% and one to three times per week in 43% of subjects. The declines in consumption frequency of more difficult to chew foods with study dentures were in a higher percentage of subjects in the implant than in the conventional group.
CONCLUSION: After 7 months of adaptation to new dentures, patients consumed fewer difficult-to-chew foods than with their original dentures. This decline was more frequent with mandibular implant-supported overdentures than with conventional dentures. Dietary counseling should be considered as part of implant and complete denture therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14714839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  5 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of diabetes, glycemic control, and dental implant therapy.

Authors:  Thomas W Oates; Guy Huynh-Ba; Adriana Vargas; Peggy Alexander; Jocelyne Feine
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Diabetes Effects on Dental Implant Survival.

Authors:  Thomas W Oates; Guy Huynh-Ba
Journal:  Forum Implantol       Date:  2012-02

3.  Impact of denture usage patterns on dietary quality and food avoidance among older adults.

Authors:  Margaret R Savoca; Thomas A Arcury; Xiaoyan Leng; Haiying Chen; Ronny A Bell; Andrea M Anderson; Teresa Kohrman; Gregg H Gilbert; Sara A Quandt
Journal:  J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011

4.  Standardizing the evaluation criteria on treatment outcomes of mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ha-Young Kim; Sang-Wan Shin; Jeong-Yol Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Association between Diabetes and the Use of Removable Dental Prostheses among the Korean Population.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Lee; Jung Suk Han; Kyungdo Han; Su Young Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.